Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 375 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U.S. 375 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1981 · …rules and regulations promulgated by governmental establishments pursuant to statutory authority have the force and effect of law, and concededly are subject to the same tests as statutes. ⚠ not in text
24 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics (dc, 1981-10-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics (2×)
D.C. · 1981 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
rules and regulations promulgated by governmental establishments pursuant to statutory authority have the force and effect of law, and concededly are subject to the same tests as statutes.
discussed Cited "see" Wilson Realty & Construction, Inc. v. Asheboro-Randolph Board of Realtors, Inc. (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Avent, 253 N.C. 580 , 118 S.E.2d 47 (1961), vacated on other grounds, 373 U.S. 375 , 10 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
AVENT ET AL.
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.
11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1963.
373 U.S. 375
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2)
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.

Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, William A. Marsh, Jr., F. B. McKissick, C. O. Pearson, W. G. Pearson, M. Hugh Thompson, William T. Coleman, Jr., William R. Ming, Jr., Louis H. Pollak, Joseph L. Rauh and Herbert O. Reid.

Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was T. W. Bruton, Attorney General.

Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Ralph S. Spritzer, Louis F. Claiborne, Harold H. Greene, Howard A. Glickstein and Richard K. Berg.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for consideration in the light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, ante, p. 244. Patterson v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 600.

[For opinion of MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, see ante, p. 248.]