green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Hentz v. State
See United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mozo
See United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stern v. Shalala
Courts enforce what “the defendant reasonably understood” the plea agreement to mean when the guilty plea was entered, United States v. Corsentino, 685 F.2d 48, 51 (2d Cir.1982); accord, e.g., United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1521 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); In re Arnett, 804 F.2d 1200, 1203 (11th Cir.1986); United States v. Crusco, 536 F.2d 21, 27 (3d Cir.1976); Johnson v. Beto, 466 F.2d 478, 480 (5th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stern v. Shalala
Ultimately, the amount of the losses, as determined in the administrative proceedings, was $70,648, the amount of assessments sought by the IG. 11 Courts enforce what "the defendant reasonably understood" the plea agreement to mean when the guilty plea was entered, United States v. Corsentino, 685 F.2d 48, 51 (2d Cir.1982); accord, e.g., United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1521 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); In re Arnett, 804 F.2d 1200, 1203 (11th Cir.1986); United States v. Crusco, 536 F.2d 21, 27 (3d Cir.1976); Johnson v. Beto, 466 F.2d 47…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Dwayne Anderson
See United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1522 (11th Cir.) (Parole Commission could consider the information provided by the government even if that information was improperly included in the PSR), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 *607 S.Ct. 82, 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); Levesque v. Brennan, 864 F.2d 515, 518 (7th Cir.1988) (same); Ochoa v. United States, 819 F.2d 366, 372 (2d Cir.1987) (same); Sheppard v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 738 F.Supp. 888, 890 (M.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Willette v. Finn
See Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting v. Sotheby Parke Bernet, Inc., 839 F.2d 780, 782 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); McCormick on Evidence § 12, at 31 (E.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jimmy Lee Jefferies, Betty J. Jefferies
See Tobon-Hernandez, 845 F.2d at 281 (remanding for specific performance), United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519, 1525 (11th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 829 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); Arnett, 804 F.2d at 1204 (granting writ of mandamus and ordering specific performance).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis Gaste and Les Editions Louis Gaste v. Morris Kaiserman A/K/A Morris Albert, and Fermata International Melodies, Inc.
See NLRB v. Star Color Plate Service, 843 F.2d 1507 , 1510 n. 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); NLRB v. Local Union No. 46, Metallic Lathers, 727 F.2d 234, 238 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thompson v. State
See State v. Mozo, 655 So.2d 1115, 1117 (Fla.1995) (holding that interception of an electronic communication occurs where the communication originates); see also United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abbott v. Village of Winthrop Harbor
See, e.g., United States v. Nelson, 837 F.2d 1519 , 1527 *938 (11th Cir.) (“[T]he term ‘intercept’ as it relates to ‘aural acquisitions’ refers to the place where a communication is initially obtained regardless of where the communication is ultimately heard.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 829 , 109 S.Ct. 82 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988); United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 659 (5th Cir.1976) (“[W]e conclude that no new and distinct interception occurs when the contents of a communication are revealed through the replaying of a previous recording.”), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 823 , 97 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford Ward
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 228.02[2.-l] (2d ed. 1994 & Supp.1995) (listing cases where issue deemed abandoned because appellant did not raise it in brief); see also NLRB v. Star Color Plate Serv., 843 F.2d 1507 , 1510 n. 3 (2d Cir.) (appellate court may reject any argument raised for the first time in a reply *93 brief), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 828 , 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re State Police Litigation
See United States v. Turk, 526 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 828 , 97 S.Ct. 74 , 50 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976). 35 Thus while the Act does not precisely define what an interception is, it must be deemed to have occurred “when the contents of wire communications are captured or redirected in any way.” United States v. Rodriguez, 968 F.2d 130, 136 (2d Cir.) (holding both location where conversation was redirected and where it was overheard sufficed as situs of “interception” for jurisdictional purposes), cert. denied, — U.S. -, -, -, 113 S.Ct. 139 , 140, 663, 121 L.Ed.2d 92 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Parents & Friends of the Specialized Living Center
See also N.L.R.B. v. Star Color Plate Serv., 843 F.2d 1507 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988), where there was a five-year delay between the representation election and NLRB certification.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Parents And Friends Of The Specialized Living Center
See also N.L.R.B. v. Star Color Plate Serv., 843 F.2d 1507 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 81 , 102 L.Ed.2d 58 (1988), where there was a five-year delay between the representation election and NLRB certification.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Star Color Plate Service, Division of Einhorn Enterprises, Inc.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 87-2126.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 1988.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.