green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
“summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which congress and the supreme court visualized these cases”
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 43 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bass v. City of Wilson
summary judgments should seldom be used in cases alleging employment discrimination because of the special category in which congress and the supreme court visualized these cases
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. United States
Ct. 782,102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Austin v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 795 (Fed.Cir.1988) (“We must, therefore, reject appellants’ contention that the agency’s regulations formed an integral part of the Smithsons’ contract with FmHA and that violation of any of those regulations can serve as a proper basis for the complainants’ claims of breach of contract.”), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fry v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (claims based on unauthorized acts (wrongdoing) by the [Government officials sound in tort); see also 28 U.S.C. 1491(a) (“the United States Court of Federal Claims shall have jurisdiction upon any claim ... in eases not sounding in tort.” (emphasis added)).
cited
Cited "see"
Wildman v. Burke Marketing Corp.
Ctr., 128 F.3d 1201, 1205 (8th Cir.1997)); see Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 364 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. State
(2×)
These courts have unanimously held that "impeachment by pri- or inconsistent statement may not be permitted where employed as a mere subterfuge to get before the jury evidence not otherwise admissible.” Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834, 839 (5th Cir.1979) (quoting United States v. Morlang, 531 F.2d 183, 190 (4th Cir.1975)); United States v. Johnson, 802 F.2d 1459, 1466 (D.C.Cir.1986); Accord United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1479 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); United States v. Frappier, 807 F.2d 257, 259 (1st Cir.1986), cert. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Sunrise Village Mobile Home Park, L.C. v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dureiko v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pacific National Cellular v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cer t. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.Cl. 371, 374 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Englert v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beno v. United Telephone Co. of Florida
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (distinguishing between “direct evidence” case and McDonnell Douglas case).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCauley v. States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Berdick v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 94, 99 , 612 F.2d 533, 536 (1979); Curry v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 741, 746 , 609 F.2d 980, 982-83 (1979); Blazavich v. United States, 29 Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
Tolerson v. Auburn Steel Co., Inc.
See id. (citing Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 364-65 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dietrich v. Canadian Pacific Ltd.
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., 827 F.2d 363 , 367-68 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); see also Bashara v. Black Hills Corp., 26 F.3d 820, 823 (8th Cir.1994). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
National Leased Housing Ass'n v. United States
See Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert, denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (quoting Eastport S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique Pedraza
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1481 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard C. Gaworski, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor v. Itt Commercial Finance Corp., a Nevada Corporation Itt Financial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Itt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Richard C. Gaworski, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor v. Itt Commercial Finance Corp., a Nevada Corporation Itt Financial Corporation, a Delaware Corporation Itt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Co., 778 F.2d 512, 515 (8th Cir.1985); see generally Walker v. AT & T Technologies, 995 F.2d 846 (8th Cir.1993). 56 Although we have sometimes found that an employer's "reduction in force" may have been a ruse to mask intentional age discrimination, see, e.g., Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 (8th Cir.1987), 14 cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989), Gaworski's own testimony shows that is not the case here.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nigel D. Ince
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474 , 1479 n. 3 (10th Cir.1988) (citing cases), cert. denied, 488 *580 U.S. 1004, 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lee KOPP, Appellant, v. SAMARITAN HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., and Saadi Albaghdadi, Appellees
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Industries, Inc., 827 F.2d 363, 365 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fisher v. Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (comments not direct evidence of discrimination where plaintiff inferred discriminatory intent from the comment).
cited
Cited "see"
Green v. Fairfax County School Board
See Perry, 738 F.Supp. at 851 (citing Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
61 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1301, 62 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,381 Bill Clark Herbert Futch Austin Hurst Louis Sliker and William Barrineau v. Coats & Clark, Inc.
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 831 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc.
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 831 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
William F. GLOVER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORP., Defendant-Appellant
See Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indus., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 367 (8th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (quoting Christie v. Foremost Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davies v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Florida, Inc.
Carter, 870 F.2d at 581 ; see, Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (11th Cir.1988); Buckley v. Hospital Corp. of America, Inc., 758 F.2d 1525, 1529-30 (11th Cir.1985); Bell v. Birmingham Linen Service, 715 F.2d 1552, 1557 (11th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Carter
The government may not introduce evidence of prior statements “ ‘under the guise of impeachment for the primary purpose of placing before the jury substantive evidence which is not otherwise admissible.’ ” United States v. Miller, 664 F.2d 94, 97 (5th Cir.1981) (emphasis in original); see United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1479 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ezold v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen
See Bhaya v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 832 F.2d 258 , 260 (3d Cir.1987), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989), citing Massarsky v. General Motors Corp., 706 F.2d 111 (3d Cir.1983). 5.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Michael Wach
See United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1483 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1099, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,295 Marcel Verbraeken, Cross-Appellant v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., Cross-Appellee
See Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Anderson v. Savage Laboratories, Inc., 675 F.2d 1221, 1224 (11th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
Christopher Assocs., 511 F.3d at 1384 ; see also Smithson v. United States, 847 F.2d 791, 794 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armindo v. Padlocker, Inc.
See McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-05 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824-1826 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); see also Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (distinguishing between a “direct evidence” and a McDonnell Douglas case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Upper Chattahoochee Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. City of Atlanta
An issue of material fact is not genuine if the issue is unsupported by the evidence, or if the issue is created by evidence that is “merely color-able” or “not significantly probative.” Id. at 250 , 106 S.Ct. at 2511; see also Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 828 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Hudson v. Southern Ductile Casting Corp., 849 F.2d 1372, 1376 (11th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Holmes v. Marriott Corp.
See, e.g., Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825 (11th Cir.1988) (statements that plaintiff lacked the “wherewithal” to perform his job, “moved in slow motion,” and was “proactive” on the job held to be not evidence of age discrimination), cert. denied 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); *707 Shostak v. United States Postal Serv., 662 F.Supp. 158, 161-62 (D.Me.1987) (comment that plaintiff was “too old for job” was not proof of age discrimination where comment was made when plaintiff was struggling with heavy mail bags, sweating and looking tired.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotarski v. Binks Manufacturing Co.
See also Hillebrand v. M-Tron Indust., Inc., 827 F.2d 363 , 366 n. 6 (8th Cir.1987) (citing cases and stating elimination of requirement as black letter rule), cert. de nied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miranda v. State
See Pruitt v. State, 770 S.W.2d 909, 910 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1989, pet. ref’d); see also United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1479 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); United States v. Johnson, 802 F.2d 1459, 1466 (D.C.Cir.1986); United States v. Hogan, 763 F.2d 697, 702 (5th Cir.1985), modified on other grounds, 771 F.2d 82 (5th Cir.1985), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 779 F.2d 296 (5th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacDonald v. Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center
See, e.g., Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825 , 829 n. 3 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Rosenfield v. Wellington Leisure Prods., Inc., 827 F.2d 1493 , 1495 n. 2 (11th Cir.1987); Pace v. Southern Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
56 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1149, 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,918 James MacDonald and Janice MacDonald v. Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center, a Wyoming Non-Profit Corporation, Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center Board of Directors, Joe S. Schaid and Jane Stearns
See, e.g., Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825 , 829 n. 3 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989); Rosenfield v. Wellington Leisure Prods., Inc., 827 F.2d 1493 , 1495 n. 2 (11th Cir.1987); Pace v. Southern Ry.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ronald A. Davis
See also United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1478 (10th Cir.1988) (jury instruction broadened indictment, but there was no prejudice because the evidence at trial corresponded to the offense charged in the indictment), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angel Fernandez-Angulo
Compare United States v. Serino, 835 F.2d 924, 932 (1st Cir.1987) and United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 832 , 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 67 (1987) (holding resentencing is not always required) with United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474, 1483 (10th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) and United States v. Lawal, 810 F.2d 491, 492-93 (5th Cir.1987) and United States v. O'Neill, 767 F.2d 780, 787 (11th Cir.1985) (holding that resentencing is required).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1159, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,977 Gendra Sennello v. Reserve Life Insurance Company, a Foreign Corporation Doing Business in the State of Florida
Compare also, Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sennello v. Reserve Life Insurance
Compare also, Young v. General Foods Corp., 840 F.2d 825, 829 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 782 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
M-Tron Industries, Inc.
v.
Hillebrand
v.
Hillebrand
No. 87-1420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 9, 1989.
Cited by 236 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. North Carolina (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.