green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc.
Meyer, Inc., 889 F.2d 1497 (C.A.6 1989) cert. den., 494 U.S. 1057 , 110 5.Ct. 1527, 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Trejo-Islas
(2×)
See United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735 , 737 n. 1 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald Cranmer v. Walt Chapleau, Warden
See Dale v. Haeberlin, 878 F.2d 930, 935 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 (1990). 6 Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Joe
(2×)
See United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 737 (3d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonathan Boyd and Robert Keith Powell, Jonathan L. Boyd
(2×)
See United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 741 (3d Cir.1989) (“[T]he underlying statute shall control in case of conflict with the Sentencing Guidelines.”), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990); U.S.S.G. §§ 5G1.1, 7B1.4(b), p.s. (when Guidelines establish sentence either above statutory maximum or below statutory minimum, statutory maximum or minimum controls).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. DiNome
(2×)
See United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 737-38 (3d Cir.1989) (hearsay statements by a murder victim are admissible to show motive), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca2 1992
(2×)
See United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 737-38 (3d Cir.1989) (hearsay statements by a murder victim are admissible to show motive), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990). 27 Ustica's related contention that the hearsay statements should have been excluded because they lacked the requisite additional indicia of reliability is misplaced. "[I]f a[n out-of-court] declaration comes within a category defined as an exception, the declaration is admissible without any preliminary finding of probable credibility by the judge...." United States v. DiMaria, 727 F.2d 265…
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles A. Helton v. William A. Fauver, Robert J. Del Tufo
(2×)
See Dale v. Haeberlin, 878 F.2d 930, 934 (6th Cir.1989) (“We hold that the constitutional due process protections, like ex post facto protections, do extend to proscribe judicially enforced changes in interpretations of the law that unforeseeably expand the punishment accompanying a conviction beyond that which an actor could have anticipated at the time of committing a criminal act.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990); Devine v. New Mexico Dep’t of Corrections, 866 F.2d 339 (10th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kellogg v. Shoemaker
(2×)
See also Dale v. Haeberlin, 878 F.2d 930, 935 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kellogg v. Shoemaker
(2×)
See also Dale v. Haeberlin, 878 F.2d 930, 935 (6th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bogusz
See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.1(a) ("Where the statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guideline range, the statutorily authorized maximum sentence shall be the guideline sentence."); see also United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 741 (3d Cir. 1989) ("the underlying statute shall control in case of conflict with the Sentencing Guidelines"), cert. denied., 494 U.S. 1058 (1990). 3 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Bogusz, A/K/A Bogey, United States of America v. John O'rourke, A/K/A Hap
(4×)
Sec. 5G1.1(a) ("Where the statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guideline range, the statutorily authorized maximum sentence shall be the guideline sentence."); see also United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 741 (3d Cir.1989) ("the underlying statute shall control in case of conflict with the Sentencing Guidelines"), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990). 7 At O'Rourke's sentencing, the district court again adopted the PSR's recommendation to apply U.S.S.G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wood
(2×)
See, e.g„ United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 738 (3d Cir.1989) (victim’s statements regarding plan to end relationship relevant to defendant’s mental state in murder prosecution), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058, 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990); State v. Payne, 327 N.C. 194 , 394 S.E.2d *63 158, 165, cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1092 , 111 S.Ct 977 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1062 (1990). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Debra A. Hartmann, Kenneth K. Kaenel, and John Scott Korabik
(2×)
See also United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990) (statements evincing a plan to deceive spouse were admitted to establish both that declarant intended to carry out the plan and that she did so).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See also Turpin v. Commonwealth, Ky., 780 S.W.2d 619 (1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1530 , 108 L.Ed.2d 769 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Shepard
(2×)
See also, United States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 738 (3rd Cir.1989), (en banc), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1058 , 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990) (murder victim’s statement of plan to separate from her husband admissible to show defendant’s motive for murder was other than claimed); Garries, 19 M.J. at 858 (murder victim’s statement of intent to leave military service admissible to show the likely situs of the murder); United States v. Dodson, 16 M.J. 921, 928-929 (N.M.C.M.R.1983), aff’d in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 21 M.J. 237 (C.M.A.), aff’d on rehearing, 22 M.J. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald Mark Williams
See United States v. Garcia-Pillado, 898 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir.1990) (“[T]here was no general repeal of statutory minimum sentences” when the Guidelines were enacted.); United States v. Stewart, 879 F.2d 1268, 1272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 256 , 107 L.Ed.2d 205 (1989); see also United *727 States v. Donley, 878 F.2d 735, 740-41 (3rd Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1528 , 108 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).
Donley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-6108.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1990.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.