green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.7 score
“by 'civil action' we mean what was once called an action at law. there is no right to a jury trial in equity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Tualatin Tire & Auto, Inc.
by 'civil action' we mean what was once called an action at law. there is no right to a jury trial in equity.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 873 , 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Kahled Burgos, United States of America v. Alexio Burnard Gobern
(2×)
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 753, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1177 United States of America v. Paula Andrews, United States of America v. Ivan Andrews
See id.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephan Gary Hill
See United States v. Porter, 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir.1990) (finding that § 3742 "reflects Congress' measured judgment to allow only limited appellate review of sentences imposed under the guidelines”). 12 . 64 F.3d 147, 150 (4th Cir.1995). 13 . 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.) (recognizing that a defendant may appeal a district court's refusal to depart downward if the sentence was imposed in violation of law because the district court misconstrued its authority to depart), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Greist v. Phillips
(2×)
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or 387 , 788 P2d 435 (held statutory products liability state of repose did not violate the remedy guarantee clause in Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution, even though it eliminated the plaintiff’s remedy before the plaintiff suffered an injury), cert den 498 US 819 , 111 S Ct 65 , 112 L Ed 2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Dorsey
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.) (a refusal to depart is reviewable when it is based on the erroneous conclusion of the district court that it lacked authority to depart), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 66 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Baxter v. Sturm, Ruger & Co.
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Or. 387, 392 , 788 P.2d 435 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S. Ct. 65 , 112 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). “[[Investigators’ reports ‘clearly fall within the language of the Jencks Act.’” United States v. Hudson, 813 F.Supp. 1482, 1490 (D.Kan.1993) (quoting United States v. Allen, 798 F.2d 985, 997 (7th Cir.1986)); see United States v. Smith, 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (“Interview notes could be ‘statements’ under the Act if they are substantially verbatim.” (citations omitted)), cert, denied, — …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackson
United States v. Smith 984 F.2d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.) (citation omitted), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 204 , 126 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); see United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 867 (9th Cir.1989), modified on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p. 13,739 William L. Baxter, Ppa Andrew T. Baxter, Third-Party-Defendant v. Sturm, Ruger & Co. Inc., Third-Party-Plaintiff
See Sealey v. Hicks, 309 Ore. 387, 392 , 788 P.2d 435, 437 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 [ 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 ] (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shirley F. Crowell, United States of America v. Alan Julian, United States of America v. Lora G. Horner, United States of America v. Barbara Ellen Burrell, United States of America v. Annie Varner Reomer
See id. 21 G.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Theodore Fonville
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Willis Ray Cash
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sergio Rafael Gonzalez
(2×)
This latter approach is supported by the same rationale we apply to cases making a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel: "We prefer appellants to raise such claims in a habeas proceeding because it permits the district judge first to decide whether the claim has merit, and second, if it does, to develop a record as to what counsel did, why it was done, and what, if any, prejudice resulted." United States v. Molina, 934 F.2d 1440, 1446 (9th Cir.1991); accord United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 859 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 902 F.2d 18 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 6…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Earl Watson
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 859 (9th Cir.1989), amended, 902 F.2d 18 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Danny Ray Hall
(2×)
See United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 30-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sure-Snap Corporation v. State Street Bank And Trust Company
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (following bankruptcy court's order confirming sale of an asset, trustee's suit against purchaser alleging fraud held barred). 36 On the final issue of factual similarity, appellants also are not persuasive.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sure-Snap Corp. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.
See Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (following bankruptcy court’s order confirming sale of an asset, trustee’s suit against purchaser alleging fraud held barred).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Maurice Isabel, United States of America v. Ronald Descoteaux, A/K/A Piece of Cake, A/K/A Wacky Ron
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836 , 861 n. 24 (9th Cir.1989) (declining to consider merits of allegations of perjured testimony made without benefit of citation to record) (collecting cases), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tommy Hart v. Allan A. Stagner
See United States v. Rewald, 889 F.2d 836, 864 (9th Cir.1989), amended on other grounds, 902 F.2d 18 , cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (although crime occurred in isolated state of Hawaii, no prejudice because not a small or rural community).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Thomas
See, e.g., U.S. v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (rejecting due process challenge to sentencing scheme based upon aggregate weight of Dilaudid); Van Ens v. Florida, 48 So.3d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010), review denied, 59 So.3d 110 (Fla.2011) (sentencing scheme based upon aggregate weight of the narcotic pill Lorcet did not violate either equal protection or due process); North Carolina v. Jones, 85 N.C.App. 56 , 354 S.E.2d 251 (1987), review denied, 320 N.C. 173 , 358 S.E.2d 61 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 969 , 108 S.Ct. 4…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Ed Young, Sr.
(2×)
See also United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31-32 (4th Cir.) (although “mixture or substance” notation refers to drug quantity table in Guidelines § 2Dl.l(c), it also applies to drug equivalency table in that section’s commentary), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Girtha L. Gulley
(2×)
See also United States v. Bayerle, 898 F.2d 28, 31 (4th Cir.) (dismissing appeal since district court’s refusal to depart was based on its conclusion that the evidence did not justify a departure), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 819 , 111 S.Ct. 65 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 90-2039, 90-2040
In its recent decision in In re Howe (Howe v. Vaughan ), 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir.1990), the court stated, "[t]he D-1 Enterprises court merely decided that when a claim cannot be litigated effectively, it is not precluded." Howe, 913 F.2d at 1146 ; see also, Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (distinguishing D-1 Enterprises from Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1984) on the basis of the limited nature of the proceeding in D-1 Enterprises ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sanders Confectionery Products, Inc. v. Heller Financial, Inc.
In its recent decision in In re Howe (Howe v. Vaughan), 913 F.2d 1138 (5th Cir.1990), the court stated, “[t]he D-l Enterprises court merely decided that when a claim cannot be litigated effectively, it is not precluded.” Howe, 913 F.2d at 1146 ; see also, Hendrick v. Avent, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990) (distinguishing D-1 Enterprises from Southmark Properties v. Charles House Corp., 742 F.2d 862 (5th Cir.1984) on the basis of the limited nature of the proceeding in D-l Enterprises).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Castle County v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
See also Starns v. Avent, 96 B.R. 620, 630 (M.D.La.1989) (citing other cases holding that a court’s formal order, not its oral expressions, controls), aff’d, 891 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 64 , 112 L.Ed.2d 39 (1990). .The court’s order, dated November 2, 1987, provides: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion entered in this case on this date, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rewald
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-1920.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1990.
Published
Citer courts: Oregon Supreme Court (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.