green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…even if we agreed with the defendant, we could not overrule the decision of an earlier panel
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Davis v. Internal Revenue Service
But see IRS v. Nordic Village, Inc. (In re Nordic Village, Inc.), 915 F.2d 1049, 1051 (6th Cir.1990) (ruling that Hoffman is not controlling precedent when case concerns waiver of sovereign immunity under 11 U.S.C. § 106 for federal, as opposed to state, governmental unit), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gary Gilliam
(2×)
even if we agreed with the defendant, we could not overrule the decision of an earlier panel
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy Zappulla v. People of the State of New York
See People v. Zappulla, 282 A.D.2d at 697-98 , 724 N.Y.S.2d at 435-36 . 19 Federal courts considering petitions for writs of habeas corpus are not "bound by a state appellate court's ruling in petitioner's favor on a matter of constitutional law." Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1093 (2d Cir.1990) (affirming district court denial of habeas on the basis of evidence ordered suppressed by the state appellate court), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Flores v. Demskie
See Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Velez v. People of the State of New York
It is predicated on principles of judicial comity, and is “designed to protect the state courts’ role in the enforcement of federal law and prevent disruption of state judicial proceedings.” Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 518 , 102 S.Ct. 1198, 1203 , 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982); see Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1094 (2d Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corporation v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) ("lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative"), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) ("Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.") (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments Sec. 28 (1982) (issue preclusion may not …
discussed
Cited "see"
Remington Rand Corp. v. Amsterdam-Rotterdam Bank, N.V.
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 330 , 99 S.Ct. 645, 651 , 58 L.Ed.2d 552 (1979); accord Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990) (“lack of incentive to litigate vigorously may render the collateral estoppel doctrine inoperative”), cer t. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991); United States v. Berman, 884 F.2d 916, 924 (6th Cir.1989) (“Unfairness can result when the party to be bound lacked an incentive to litigate in the first trial.”) (internal quotation marks omitted); Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 28 (1982) (issue preclusion m…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger D. Maples
(2×)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1196-97 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 ; United States v. Glover, 846 F.2d 339, 342 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 , 109 S.Ct. 533 , 102 L.Ed.2d 565 ; United States v. Mavrokordatos, 933 F.2d 843, 847-48 (10th Cir.1991); United States v. Euceda-Hernandez, 768 F.2d 1307, 1312 (11th Cir.1985). 14 In United States v. Bartle, 835 F.2d 646 (6th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 969 , 108 S.Ct. 1245 , 99 L.Ed.2d 443 (1988), the Sixth Circuit addressed the scope of a district court's discretion in imposing …
cited
Cited "see"
Frederick J. King v. Gerald Young and John Patterson
Simmons, 9 F.3d at 558 (quoting Mahoney, 976 F.2d at 1057 ); see Smith v. City of Chicago, 913 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2824 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark K. Cross
See U.S. v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1199 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2824 (1991), and U.S. v. Brewer, 853 F.2d 1319, 1322 (6th Cir.1988), cert. denied 488 U.S. 946 (1988) and 489 U.S. 1021 (1989). 16 Because there is no plausible argument that the defendant did not receive actual notice of the government's intent to seek enhanced punishment in this case, we need not address that question in this opinion.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold M. Newcomb
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1198 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Roscoe McGlocklin
(2×)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1195 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, -U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Katsakis (No. 90-1164) Brian Lee McLennan (No. 90-1327) and Jessie Kincaid (No. 90-2165)
See United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193, 1199 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2824 (1991) 5 McLennan contends that, because Abrams' testimony regarding his 1987 drug purchases was admitted solely for the purpose of showing knowledge of the drug conspiracy in 1985, it may not be used at sentencing to support a finding of continued acquiescence in the conspiracy.
cited
Cited "see"
Boothe v. McLellan
See Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 198 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), cert denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuller v. Jewelry
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant's motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); United States v. Munoz, 746 F.2d 1389, 1390 (9th Cir.1984) (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised below in a contract action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fuller v. M.G. Jewelry
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); United States v. Munoz, 746 F.2d 1389, 1390 (9th Cir.1984) (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised below in a contract action).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Airlines, Inc. Midway Airlines Muse Air Corporation v. United Airlines, Inc., Alaska Airlines, Inc, and Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., and American Airlines, Inc.
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiff's failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant's motion for summary judgment waived the issue), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); Munoz, 746 F.2d at 1390 (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised in contract action below).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc.
See Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (holding that plaintiffs failure to raise an issue in opposition to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment waived the issue), ce rt. granted, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); Munoz, 746 F.2d at 1390 (refusing to consider a tort theory not raised in contract action below).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crespo v. New York City Police Commissioner
Under New York law, “a party has not had a full and fair opportunity to litigate an issue if it has had no opportunity to appeal the adverse finding.” Fletcher, 68 F.3d at 1458 (citing People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771, 772 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994), appeal denied, 84 N.Y.2d 1035 , 623 N.Y.S.2d 191 , 647 N.E.2d 463 (1995)); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1096 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991) (collateral es-toppel does not apply when appellate review is unobtainable as a matter of law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Daryl H. Bunkley v. Larry R. Meachum, Commissioner of Correction, State of Connecticut
See also Pinkney v. Keane, 920 F.2d 1090, 1095 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep’t 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) (“Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it.”), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,358 Marianne E. Fletcher, Nancy L. Bartley, Raphael Paganelli, and Charlotte Evans v. Atex, Inc., Eastman Kodak Company, and Jenny L. Hermanson and Christy Scattarella v. 805 Middlesex Corp., F/k/a Atex, Inc., and Apple Computers, Inc., Eastman Kodak Company
People v. Medina, 208 A.D.2d 771 , 617 N.Y.S.2d 491, 493 (2d Dep't 1994); see also Pinkney v. Keane, 737 F.Supp. 187, 195 (E.D.N.Y.) ("Under New York law, a party who has obtained a final judgment in its favor is not normally precluded from relitigating a subsidiary issue that was decided against it."), aff'd, 920 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Douglas Carter v. William T. Burch Vernon Beamer, and John R. Isom Jeffrey Brown
(2×)
See also Smith v. City of Chicago, 913 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir.1990) (to recover more than nominal damages for a § 1983 action based on a false arrest, the plaintiff must show that although the defendants fabricated evidence, plaintiff would not have been arrested in the absence of the fabricated evidence), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1217 , 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Morris Lee Pope, A/K/A Maurice Pope
Therefore, we are unable to determine whether departure beyond the next higher criminal history category, under which the guidelines range would have been 27-33 months, to a sentence of 60 months is reasonable. 7 See Head, 927 F.2d at 1368 (upward departure based on district court's perception that defendant fit the "classic profile of a career recidivist criminal" held improper because the district court did not explain why the guideline range was inadequate or provide "any reference to the reasons for the inapplicability of the next two higher criminal history categories"); Robison, 904 F.2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robin Rene Warner (90-3753) Michelle Lynn Angel (90-3754) Joyce Ann Richmond (90-3767) Juniata Marla Redd (90-3755)
This court has repeatedly held that a person is not entitled to be notified of her Miranda rights before an interrogation if that person is not “in custody.” 2 See, e.g., United States v. Peete, 919 F.2d 1168, 1176 (6th Cir.1990) (Miranda “only applies to situations involving custodial interrogations”); United States v. Macklin, 900 F.2d 948, 950-951 (6th Cir.1990) (“A person is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only if questioned while in custody.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 116 , 112 L.Ed.2d 86 (1990); United States v. Knox, 839 F.2d 285, 291-292 (6th Cir.1988) (“…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
See also Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (rule of reason theory not considered because plaintiff did not raise it until appeal), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation
See also Image Technical Services, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 , 615 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990) (rule of reason theory not considered because plaintiff did not raise it until appeal), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Anaheim, City of Riverside, City of Banning, City of Colton, City of Azusa v. Southern California Edison Company
See also Image Technical Serv., Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 (9th Cir.1990), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2823 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mahoney v. Kesery
(2×)
See also Smith v. City of Chicago, 913 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir.1990) (acknowledging the existence of a § 1983 claim for malicious prosecution), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824 , 115 L.Ed.2d 994 (1991); Schertz v. Waupaca County, 875 F.2d 578, 582 (7th Cir.1989) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOME STATE BANK
v.
Curtis Reed JOHNSON
v.
Curtis Reed JOHNSON
No. 90-834.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)
Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.