On Leong Chinese Merchants Ass'n Bldg. v. United States, 502 U.S. 809 (1991). · Go Syfert
Search
On Leong Chinese Merchants Ass'n Bldg. v. United States, 502 U.S. 809 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“courts uniformly have held that the eighth amendment does not apply to civil in rem actions, since they are remedial in nature and not punishments for crimes”
44 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. $200,000, Representing the Contents of a First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Co. Annuity Account (ilnd, 1992-10-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. $200,000, Representing the Contents of a First Penn-Pacific Life Insurance Co. Annuity Account
N.D. Ill. · 1992 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
courts uniformly have held that the eighth amendment does not apply to civil in rem actions, since they are remedial in nature and not punishments for crimes
discussed Cited "see" United States v. 51 Pieces of Real Property
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. On Leong Chinese Merchants Ass’n Bldg., 918 F.2d 1289, 1292 (7th Cir.1990) (“The government’s burden in a civil forfeiture case is merely to establish probable cause to believe that the defendant property is subject to forfeiture.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 52 , 116 L.Ed.2d 29 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. 51 Pieces Of Real Property, Roswell, New Mexico
10th Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. On Leong Chinese Merchants Ass'n Bldg., 918 F.2d 1289, 1292 (7th Cir.1990) ("The government's burden in a civil forfeiture case is merely to establish probable cause to believe that the defendant property is subject to forfeiture."), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 52 , 116 L.Ed.2d 29 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Premises Known As 318 South Third Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota
3rd Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
The language of the forfeiture provision is plain and clear: real property used in illegal gambling operations may be seized and forfeited. 9 Id. at 489 (citations omitted); accord, United States v. On Leong Chinese Merchant's Ass'n Bldg., 918 F.2d 1289, 1297 (7th Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 52 , 116 L.Ed.2d 29 (1991); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 614 Portland Ave., 846 F.2d 166 , 167 (2d Cir.1988) (per curium).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Premises Known as 318 South Third Street
8th Cir. · 1993 · signal: accord · confidence high
Id. at 489 (citations omitted); accord, United States v. On Leong Chinese Merchant’s Ass’n Bldg., 918 F.2d 1289, 1297 (7th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 52 , 116 L.Ed.2d 29 (1991); United States v. Premises and Real Property at 614 Portland Ave., 846 F.2d 166, 167 (2d Cir.1988) (per curium).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication v. Kunz
Ind. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
“It is, of course, well settled that administrative pleadings are to be liberally construed and amended.” Brock v. Dow Chemical U.S.A., 801 F.2d 926, 930 (7th Cir.1986); see also Abercrombie v. Clarke, 920 F.2d 1351, 1360 (7th Cir.1990), *1196 cert. denied, 502 U.S. 809 , 112 S.Ct. 52 , 116 L.Ed.2d 29 (1991).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
On Leong Chinese Merchants Association Building
v.
United States
No. 90-1630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1991.
502 U.S. 809
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: N.D. Illinois (1)

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.