green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Gore v. State
See Gore v. Dugger, 763 F.Supp. 1110, 1114, 1116 (M.D.Fla.1989) (Gore III), aff'd, 933 F.2d 904 , 905 (11th Cir.1991) (Gore IV), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 123 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Exide Technologies
See Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 179 (3d Cir.1991), reh’g denied 941 F.2d 154 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schouten v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
See Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 172 (3d Cir.1991) (“Section 1981 does not mention national origin”), cert. denied 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (1992); King v. Township of E.
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenberg v. Camden County Vocational & Technical Schools
See Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 176 (3rd Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca9 1997
See Castro v. Oklahoma, 71 F.3d 1502, 1513 (10th Cir.1995) (noting that in pre-Ake cases, the inquiry is whether petitioner could have made a preliminary showing) (citing Liles v. Saffle, 945 F.2d 333, 336 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 123 (1992)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gretzler v. Stewart
See Castro v. Oklahoma, 71 F.3d 1502, 1513 (10th Cir.1995) (noting that in pre-Ake eases, the inquiry is whether petitioner could have made a preliminary showing) (citing Liles v. Saffle, 945 F.2d 333, 336 (10th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 123 (1992)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. State of Del. Dept. of Public Instruction
See Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 173 (3d Cir.1991) (opining that “[discrimination stems from a reliance on immaterial outward appearances that stereotype an individual with imagined, usually undesirable, characteristics thought to be common to members of the group that shares these superficial traits.”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Restrepo-Contreras v. United States
See ___ United States v. Restrepo-Contreras, 942 F.2d 96 (1st Cir. _____________ __________________ 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Restrepo-Contreras v. United States
See United States v. Restrepo-Contreras, 942 F.2d 96 (1st Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Todaro v. County of Union
Squires, supra, 54 F. 3d at 174; see also Bennun v. Rutgers, 737 F.Supp. 1393 (D.N.J.1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed. 2d 124 (1992); Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc., 444 F. 2d 1194 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 536 , 30 L.Ed. 2d 543 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. Rutgers Casualty Insurance
Dist., 700 F.2d 253 (5th Cir.1983); accord, Nord v. United States, 758 F.2d 1462 (11th Cir.1985); Taylor v. Teletype Corp., 648 F.2d 1129 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 969 , 102 S.Ct. 515 , 70 L.Ed.2d 386 (1981); see also, Bennun v. Rutgers State University, 941 F.2d 154, 157 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (1992) (affirming Title VII order for promotion and back pay).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UPS Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
Co., 22 F.3d 534, 537 (3d Cir.1994) (citation omitted) ("[W]e have an independent obligation to consider jurisdictional issues, and ‘the doctrine of standing ... goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the district court and the validity of its judgment ab ini-tio.’ ”); see also Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 168 (3d Cir.1991) (referring to "those constitutional and prudential [standing] limitations that restrict a court's power to act and so must be resolved before we can proceed further on the merits”), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ups Worldwide Forwarding, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
Co., 22 F.3d 534, 537 (3d Cir.1994) (citation omitted) ("[W]e have an independent obligation to consider jurisdictional issues, and 'the doctrine of standing ... goes to the subject matter jurisdiction of the district court and the validity of its judgment ab initio.' "); see also Bennun v. Rutgers State Univ., 941 F.2d 154 , 168 (3d Cir.1991) (referring to "those constitutional and prudential [standing] limitations that restrict a court's power to act and so must be resolved before we can proceed further on the merits"), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1066 , 112 S.Ct. 956 , 117 L.Ed.2d 124 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Turner
Compare, e.g., United States v. Palacios-Molina, 7 F.3d 49, 54-55 (5th Cir.1993) (weight of non-usable liquid solvent containing cocaine should not be included in calculation of drag amount for determining base offense level) and United States v. Acosta, 963 F.2d 551, 556-57 (2d Cir.1992) (weight of creme liqueur in which cocaine was dissolved should not be included in calculating base offense level) and United States v. Jennings, 945 F.2d 129, 136-37 (6th Cir.1991) (weight of poisonous by-products used in “cooking” methamphetamine should not be used for determining base offense level), cl…
Restrepo-Contreras
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 91-6502.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1992.
502 U.S. 1066
Certio, Rari.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White would grant certio-rari.