green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
“even if summary judgment was erroneously denied, the proper redress would not be through appeal of that denial but through subsequent motions for judgment as a matter of law ... and appellate review of those motions if they were denied.”
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Haberman v. Hartford Insurance Group
even if summary judgment was erroneously denied, the proper redress would not be through appeal of that denial but through subsequent motions for judgment as a matter of law ... and appellate review of those motions if they were denied.
cited
Cited "see"
Limandri v. Allstate Ins. Co.
See Rolick v. Collins Pine Co. , 925 F.2d 661 , 664 (3d Cir. 1991), cert. denied , 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. Mcgill Manufacturing Company, Inc.
See Cowan v. Strafford R-VI School District, 140 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir.1998); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Golden Triangle, 121 F.3d 351, 354 (8th Cir.1997); Johnson International Co. v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co., 19 F.3d 431, 434 (8th Cir.1994); see generally l5B Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3914.28, at 210-11 & n. 18 (2d ed.1992). "[E]ven if summary judgment was erroneously denied, the proper redress would not be through appeal of that denial but through subsequent motions for judgment as a matter of law ... and appellate review of those mo…
discussed
Cited "see"
White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. McGill Manufacturing Co.
See Cowan v. Strafford R-VI School District, 140 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir.1998); Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Golden Triangle, 121 F.3d 351, 354 (8th Cir.1997); Johnson International Co. v. Jackson National Life Insurance Co., 19 F.3d 431, 434 (8th Cir.1994); see generally 15B Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3914.28, at 210-11 & n. 18 (2d ed.1992). “[E]ven if summary judgment was erroneously denied, the proper redress would not be through appeal of that denial but through subsequent motions for judgment as a matter of law ... and appellate review of those …
cited
Cited "see"
Emery Duane Gust and Dennie G. Dighera v. Jeffrey S. Jones and Willis Shaw Frozen Food Express, Inc., Emery Duane Gust, and Dennie G. Dighera v. Jeffrey S. Jones and Willis Shaw Frozen Food Express, Inc.
See Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Gust v. Jones
See Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Regents of the University of Colorado
See Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1254 (10th Cir.1992) (“ ‘Reasonably expended’ hours would not include time spent on claims ‘unrelated’ to those on which [defendant] prevails.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp. Orson, Inc., D/b/a/ Roxy Screening Rooms
See Rolick v. Collins Pine Co., 925 F.2d 661, 664 (3d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lama Romero v. Asociacion
See Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1250 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993); Bottineau Farmers Elevator v. Woodword-Clyde Consultants, 963 F.2d 1064 , 1068 n. 5 (8th Cir.1992); Jarrett v. Epperly, 896 F.2d 1013 , 1016 & n. 1 (6th Cir.1990); Holley v. Northrop Worldwide Aircraft Servs., Inc., 835 F.2d 1375, 1378 (11th Cir.1988) (“[A] party may not rely on the undeveloped state of the facts at the time [the party] moves for summary judgment to undermine a fully-developed set of trial facts which militate against [the party’s] case.”); …
cited
Cited "see"
Winant v. Bostic
See Cool Light Co. v. GTE Products Corp., 973 F.2d 31, 35 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Jeffrey Winant Doree M. Gerold v. Marlowe F. Bostic F. Roger Page, and Peter P. Green, III Patricia F. Green, Robert T. Desmedt Dale S. Desmedt v. Marlowe F. Bostic F. Roger Page, and Peter P. Green, III Patricia F. Green, James N. Stanard Janet G. Stanard John S. Donnell v. Marlowe F. Bostic F. Roger Page
See Cool Light Co. v. GTE Products Corp., 973 F.2d 31, 35 (1st Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marisol A. Ex Rel. Forbes v. Giuliani
See, e.g., David C. v. Leavitt, 900 F.Supp. 1547, 1560 (D.Utah 1995) (finding that time spent with an expert who did not testify at trial was compensable “so long as the time was reasonably expended in litigation of the plaintiffs case”) (citing Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1254 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Costantino v. Ventriglia
See, e.g., Rolick v. Collins Pine Co., 975 F. 2d 1009, 1013 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, 507 U.S. 973 , 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed. 2d 787 (1993) (applying Pennsylvania law): The issue to be decided here is whether the OSHA regulation is admissible in a diversity action as evidence of the standard of care owed by the defendants to the plaintiff, not whether the OSHA itself controls that issue.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific Insurance
Trujillo v. Goodman, 825 F.2d 1453, 1455 (10th Cir.1987); see also Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. United Pacific Insurance Company
Trujillo v. Goodman, 825 F.2d 1453, 1455 (10th Cir.1987); see also Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1251 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zuchel v. Denver
Normally this will encompass all hours reasonably expended on the litigation, and indeed in some cases of exceptional success an enhanced award may be justified. 76 Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435 (citation omitted); see also Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1253 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993). 77 Denver also contends that the trial court should have reduced the number of hours attributable to plaintiffs' interrogatories, depositions and research, and that a remand is necessary because the trial court did not expressly address these asser…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zuchel v. City of Denver
Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435 (citation omitted); see also Whalen v. Unit Rig, Inc., 974 F.2d 1248, 1253 (10th Cir.1992), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1417 , 122 L.Ed.2d 787 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cool Light Co., Inc.
v.
GTE Products Corp.
v.
GTE Products Corp.
No. 92-1217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1993.
Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.