green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Blaik v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916, 928-29 (5th Cir.) (upholding restitution to all victims irrespective of the counts of conviction under the rationale that all losses caused by a fraudulent scheme satisfy the specific conduct requirement of Hughey ), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 , and cert. denied, 510 U.S. 919 , 114 S.Ct. 314 , 126 L.Ed.2d 261 (1993); United States v. Brothers, 955 F.2d 493, 497 (7th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 847 , 113 S.Ct. 142 , 121 L.Ed.2d 94 (1992). of an offense" for "any victim of such offense." 18 U.S.C. § 3663 …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Blackthorne
Id. at 925-26 (internal quotation marks omitted). 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ross
See State v. Barkley, 108 Or App 756, 761 , 817 P2d 1328 (1991), aff’d in part on other grounds, 315 Or 420 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993) (“A court must first impose a fine ‘as penalty’ before it may order a defendant to pay any portion of that fine to the clerk of the court in the form of a ‘compensatory fine.’ ” (Internal citation omit- ted.)); State v. Moore, 239 Or App 30, 34 , 243 P3d 151 (2010) (“ORS 137.101(1) does not itself authorize a court to impose a fine[.]”).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Alonso
See State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 438 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993) (compensatory fine was “intended to compensate” victim’s mother for lost wages while she accompanied her daughter to court); S. J.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Rascon
See State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 431 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993) (Article I, section 11, not violated by admission into evidence of videotaped interview of child sex abuse victim where victim testified under oath at trial and the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine her about statements made on videotape and in court); State v. Rumary, 173 Or App 219, 223-24 , 21 P3d 166 (2001) (Article I, section 11, not violated by admission of witness’s otherwise admissible out-of-court statements provided that witness testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination). 6 W…
cited
Cited "see"
Jody Max Goode v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodney Wooten v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 126 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rodney Wooten v. State
See Muniz v. State , 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 ( Tex.Crim.App . 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 837 , 126 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rodney Wooten v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 (Tex.Crim.App. 1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 126 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Wisenbaker v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251-52 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Drinkwater
See State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 438 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993); State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143, 145 , 995 P2d 1202 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Axt
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993) ("In determining whether probable cause existed for the arrest, we examine the cumulative information known to all the officers who cooperated in the arrest.”) (citing Woodward v. State, 668 S.W.2d 337, 344 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1181 , 105 S.Ct. 939 , 83 L.Ed.2d 952 (1985)). .Because of my disposition of the Department's first two issues, I would not need to reach its third issue.
cited
Cited "see"
Sheldon Keith Crain v. State
See Muniz v. State , 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 ( Tex.Crim.App . 1993), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 837 , 126 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trinny Marroquin v. State
See Muniz v. State , 851 S.W.2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Coyarrubia v. State, 902 S.W.2d 549, 553 (Tex.App.–Houston [1 st Dist.] 1995, pet. ref’d).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trinny Marroquin v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W .2d 238, 251 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Coyarrubia v. State, 902 S.W .2d 549, 553 (Tex.App.–Houston [1 st Dist.] 1995, pet. ref’d). 6 Finally, even if we were to assume that a factual issue was “affirmatively contested,” the only contested evidence Appellant points to is evidence which is not material to the lawfulness of the challenged conduct in obtaining the evidence.
cited
Cited "see"
Howard v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251-52 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terrell v. Bassett
A number of federal courts have held that the effect of a successful administrative appeal is to “ ‘cure[ ]’ any procedural defect that may have occurred at the disciplinary hearing.” Sowell v. Ryan, 823 F.Supp. 107, 110 (W.D.N.Y.1992), aff'd, 996 F.2d 302 (2d Cir.1993); accord, Young v. Hoffman, 970 F.2d 1154, 1156 (2d Cir.1992), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 (1993); Harper v. Lee, 938 F.2d 104, 105 (8th Cir.1991); Hyson v. Neubert, 820 F.Supp. 184, 191 (D.N.J.1993) (“[W]here prison officials rectify the consequences of a constitutionally deficient dis…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fiez
See generally State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den 510 US 837 (1993); State v. Donahue, 165 Or App 143 , 995 P2d 1202 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251-52 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert, denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 , 690-91 n. 23 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 9 . 474 U.S. 159, 176 , 106 S.Ct. 477 , 88 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jones v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 251-52 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993). .Nor does statutory law require trial courts to admonish misdemeanor defendants on the range of punishment attached to an offense.
cited
Cited "see"
McGarity v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Lefkowitz
See United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916, 923 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 244 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Lefkowitz
See United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916, 923 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brazelton v. State
See Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 254 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993); Miller, 815 S.W.2d at 585 ; Warren, 565 S.W.2d at 933-34 ; Shafer v. State, 919 S.W.2d 885 , 887 n. 1 (Tex.App.— Fort Worth 1996, pet. ref d).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ferguson
There was some concern that a separate section covering insurers would result in a restrictive interpretation of the general definition of‘victim.’” Id. at 354 (citations omitted); see also State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 434-37 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993) (reviewing legislative history regarding 1977 enactment of ORS 137.103 to 137.109 in the context of a case involving a compensatory fine under ORS 137.101).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. Henderson
See also Young v. Hoffman, 970 F.2d 1154, 1156 (2d Cir. 1992) (declining to address whether prisoner suffered any denial of due process, since prisoner’s administrative appeal resulted in a reversal of his disciplinary sentence before he served any of the sentence, thus curing any procedural defect), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 (1993); Wycoff v. Nichols, 94 F.3d 1187, 1189 (8th Cir.1996) (rehearing and reversal cured alleged due process violation); Morissette v. Peters, 45 F.3d 1119, 1122 (7th Cir.1995) (no denial of due process if the error of which inmate co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jackson
See, e.g., State v. Barkley, 315 Or 420, 429-31 , 846 P2d 390 , cert den, 510 US 837 (1993) (examining availability of declarant in course of Article I, section 11, analysis but noting that, under White, Sixth Amendment does not require unavailability). 4 Because our decision rests on Article I, section 11, we do not consider whether defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights were violated.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. LaCorte v. SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc.
See also United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916 , 921 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 (1993) (rejecting attempt to incorporate co-defendant’s fact-specific legal arguments); United States v. Harris, 932 F.2d 1529, 1533 (5th Cir.1991) (Rule 28(i) motion to adopt co-appellant’s argument challenging sufficiency of evidence does not raise that point of error as to the adopting appellant).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See also United States v. Stouffer, 986 F.2d 916 , 921 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 115 , 126 L.Ed.2d 80 (1993) (rejecting attempt to incorporate co-defendant's fact-specific legal arguments); United States v. Harris, 932 F.2d 1529, 1533 (5th Cir.1991) (Rule 28(i) motion to adopt co-appellant's argument challenging sufficiency of evidence does not raise that point of error as to the adopting appellant). 42 We decline to apply that rule to this appeal.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lane v. State
(2×)
See also Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 243-249 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dowthitt v. State
(2×)
See also Muniz v. State, 851 S.W.2d 238, 243-249 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 837 , 114 S.Ct. 116 , 126 L.Ed.2d 82 (1993)(merger doctrine rejected in context of aggravated sexual assault as underlying offense for capital murder).
Young
v.
Hoffman
v.
Hoffman
92-8834.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1993.
Published
Young
v.
Hoffman.
No. 92-8834.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 1993.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 2d Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 970 F. 2d 1154.