green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“plaintiff proves discriminatory impact by showing statistical disparities between the number of protected class members in the qualified applicant group and those in the relevant segment of the workforce”
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sanchez v. City of Santa Ana
plaintiff proves discriminatory impact by showing statistical disparities between the number of protected class members in the qualified applicant group and those in the relevant segment of the workforce
discussed
Cited "see"
Hall v. Toreros, II, Inc.
See In re Appeal of Philip Morris U.S.A., 335 N.C. 227, 230 , 436 S.E.2d 828, 831 (1993) (having expressly prohibited contingent fees in a number of other settings where it deemed them to be inappropriate, the General Assembly would have expressly prohibited them in N.C.G.S. § 105-299 had it intended such a prohibition), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1228 , 129 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Domingo v. BOEING EMPLOYEES'CREDIT UNION
See Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 998 F.2d 1480, 1487 , rehearing denied, 13 F.3d 296 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1228 , 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wells v. Consolidated Judicial Retirement System
(2×)
See In re Appeal of Philip Morris U.S.A., 335 N.C. 227, 231 , 436 S.E.2d 828, 831 (1993) (whether to prohibit or allow contingent fee arrangements for private tax auditors is a public policy determination for the General Assembly), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1228 , 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 850 (1994); State v. Ballance, 229 N.C. 764, 767 , 51 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1949) ("[A] court is not concerned with what the law ought to be, but its function is to declare what the law is.").
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darnell Lecato Burks
See United States v. Buchanan, 985 F.2d 1372, 1376 (8th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1228 , 114 S.Ct. 2727 , 129 L.Ed.2d 850 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre N. Moore, United States of America v. Larry Jones
See United States v. Buchanan, 985 F.2d 1372, 1376 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2727 , 129 L.Ed.2d 850 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Taylor
See State v. Milke, 177 Ariz. 118, 130 , 865 P.2d 779, 791 (1993), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1227 , 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonifay v. State
See Mordenti v. State, 630 So.2d 1080 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994); Downs v. State, 572 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 829 , 112 S.Ct. 101 , 116 L.Ed.2d 72 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lambright v. Lewis
See Arizona v. Milke, 177 Ariz. 118, 128 , 865 P.2d 779, 789 (1993) (en banc) (Arizona Supreme Court has responsibility of independently reviewing aggravating and mitigating circumstances to determine whether the death penalty was properly imposed), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994); Arizona v. Watson, 129 Ariz. 60, 63 , 628 P.2d 943, 946 (1981) (en banc) (death penalty cases require the supreme court’s separate and independent judgment in deciding whether or not death appropriately imposed). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hannon v. Chater
See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k). 55 “In the typical disparate impact ease, in which the plaintiff argues that a selection criterion excludes [a class of] applicants from jobs or promotions, the plaintiff proves discriminatory impact by showing statistical disparities between the number of [ ] class members in the qualified applicant group and those in the relevant segment of the workforce, [citation] While such statistics are often difficult to compile, whether the [given] group has been disadvantaged turns on quantifiable data.” Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 998 F.2d 1480, 1486 , reh. denied, 13 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Leslie L. Brennan v. San Juan County Sheriff's Dept. William Cumming, Sheriff
See Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 998 F.2d 1480, 1486 (9th Cir.1993) (impact analysis for hiring decisions requires objective, quantifiable proof), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 2726 (1994); cf. Thomas v. Metroflight, Inc., 814 F.2d 1506, 1509-10 (10th Cir.1987) (the statistical significance required for impact analysis cannot be established when only two women are affected by anti-nepotism policy). 6 The record does not support a prima facie case of disparate treatment.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Forsythe v. Board of Education of Unified School District No. 489
See also Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 998 F.2d 1480, 1487 (9th Cir.1993) (“[T]here is nothing in Title VII which requires an employer to allow employees to express their cultural identity.”), rehearing denied, 13 F.3d 296 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 512 U.S. 1228 , 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arzate v. City of Topeka
See also Garcia v. Spun Steak Co., 998 F.2d 1480, 1487 (9th Cir.) (“[T]here is nothing Title VII which requires an employer to allow employees to express their cultural identity.”), rehearing en banc denied, 13 F.3d 296 (9th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2726 , 129 L.Ed.2d 849 (1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip Morris Inc., dba Philip Morris U. S. A.
v.
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
v.
Cabarrus County, North Carolina
No. 93-1710.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 1994.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
Sup. Ct. N. C. Motions of Committee on State Taxation, North Carolina Citizens for Business and Industry, and Institute of Property Taxation for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied.