green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eladem v. Highberger
See Lowry v. Lewis, 21 F.3d 344, 346 (9th Cir. 1994), rev. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 (1994) (an attorney is not required to file a motion he knows to be meritless). 3 Consistent with this determination, the verdict form identified Counts 1, 2, and 3 by incident, not by method.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ward v. Florida
Accord Chambers v. American Trans Air Inc., 17 F.3d 998 , (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994) (failure to promote claim is outside the scope of an equal pay claim).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ellsworth v. City of Lansing
See Harris v. City of Akron, 20 F.3d 1396, 1403 (6th Cir.) (rejecting a procedural due process challenge where a plaintiffs real estate was demolished without adequate process upon a provision allowing avoiding process where an emergency existed), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel Corp.
(2×)
Accord, e.g., Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Comm. Co., 24 F.3d 1088, 1097 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994). 26 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Dawson, Inc.
See DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 38 F.3d 1266, 1277 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994) (doctrine only “ ‘applies *139 to issues that have been decided either expressly or by necessary implication;’” citations omitted); Royal Insurance Company of America v. Quinn-L Capital Corporation, 3 F.3d 877, 880 (5th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1032 , 114 S.Ct. 1541 , 128 L.Ed.2d 193 (1994) (same); see also James Wm.
cited
Cited "see"
Larry D. Drake and Rosalie E. Drake v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company
See Chambers v. American Trans Air, Inc., 17 F.3d 998, 1005 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see"
Selerski v. Village of West Milwaukee
See Chambers v. American Trans Air, Inc., 17 F.3d 998, 1005 (7th Cir. 1994) (plaintiff asserting claim for constructive discharge must show that "working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would have been compelled to resign"), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hector v. Poulos
Given these circumstances, any attempt by defense counsel to suppress the shotgun based on the scope of the warrant would have been futile, and “the failure to take a futile action can never be deficient performance.” Rupe v. Wood, 93 F.3d 1434, 1444-15 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1142 , 117 S.Ct. 1017 , 136 L.Ed.2d 894 (1997); see also Lowry v. Lewis, 21 F.3d 344, 346 (9th Cir.) (counsel is not obligated to raise frivolous motions, and failure to do so cannot constitute ineffective assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 513 , 130 L.Ed.2d 420 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Stratton
Clabourne v. Lewis, 64 F.3d 1373, 1383 (9th Cir.1995); see also Lowry v. Lewis, 21 F.3d 344, 346 (9th Cir.) (counsel is not obligated to raise frivolous motions, and failure to do so cannot constitute ineffective assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 513 , 130 L.Ed.2d 420 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen v. Stratton
Clabourne v. Lewis, 64 F.3d 1373, 1383 (9th Cir.1995); see also Lowry v. Lewis, 21 F.3d 344, 346 (9th Cir.) (counsel is not obligated to raise frivolous motions, and failure to do so cannot constitute ineffective assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 513 , 130 L.Ed.2d 420 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roane v. Koch Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 38 F.3d 1266, 1271 (2d Cir.1994) (law of the case not implicated by denial of motion to recall mandate as procedurally unnecessary in light of adequate remedy available in district court)[, cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 ; 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994) ]; Ca-terino, 29 F.3d at 1395-96 (law of the case not implicated by affirmance based on waiver of issue); Borger v. Yamaha Int’l Corp., 625 F.2d 390, 395 (2d Cir. 1980) (law of the case not implicated by affirmance of order denying JNOV motion on timeliness grounds).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wieland v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP., STATE OF IND.
See also Chambers v. American Trans Air Inc., 17 F.3d 998, 1005 (7th Cir.1994), reh’g en banc denied, cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Arbella Mutual Insurance
See also DeWeerth v. Baldinger, 38 F.3d 1266, 1275-1276 , cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 (1994); 11 Wright, Miller & Kane § 2863 (2d ed. 1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Heidorf v. Town of Northumberland
“Substantive due process protects against government action that is arbitrary, conscience shocking, or oppressive in a constitutional sense, but not against a government action that is ‘incorrect or ill-advised.’ ” Kaluczky v. City of White Plains, 57 F.3d 202, 211 (2d Cir.1995); see also Harris v. City of Akron, 20 F.3d 1396, 1405 (6th Cir.) (evidence of faulty and hasty decision to demolish building insufficient to support substantive due process claim), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1001 , 115 S.Ct. 512 , 130 L.Ed.2d 419 (1994).
DoPadre
v.
DoPadre
v.
DoPadre
No. 94-543.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 14, 1994.
513 U.S. 1001
Published
Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.