green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
M.C. MacHinery Systems, Inc. v. Maher Terminals, Inc.
(2×)
See Hiram Walker & Sons v. Kirk Line, 877 F.2d 1508 , 1516 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1018 , 115 S.Ct. 1362 , 131 L.Ed.2d 219 (1995) (holding that stevedore would be protected by contractual COGSA provision against suit by the owner for damage to cargo occurring two days after discharge but during storage at the terminal); Generali v. D’Amico, 766 F.2d 485 (11& Cir.1985) (affirming the district court’s exercise of admiralty jurisdiction over a suit against the carrier and stevedore for cargo damage at the terminal eighteen days after discharge from the vessel); Certain Underwr…
cited
Cited "see"
Zenith Data Systems v. Electronic Data Sys
See Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. v. Kirk Line, 30 F.3d 1370 (11th Cir.) (internal citation omitted), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1018 (1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dise v. EXPRESS MARINE, INC.
See, e.g., Colon v. Apex Marine Corp., 832 F.Supp. 508, 513-14 (D.R.I.1993), aff'd, 35 F.3d 16 (1st Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1018 , 115 S.Ct. 1363 , 131 L.Ed.2d 220 (1995) (holding shipowner not liable for seaman’s injuries *465 sustained during a fight while on shore leave because he was pursuing private interests and not performing duties assigned to him, reasoning that the Jones Act standard is more limited than the maintenance and cure standard).
Hood
v.
Herald
v.
Herald
No. 94-1301.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1995.
514 U.S. 1018
Published
Ct. App. Ohio, Summit County. Certiorari denied.