green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.4 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“[Ijssues may be divided and tried separately, but a given issue may not be tried by different, successive juries.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Navelski v. International Paper Co.
ijssues may be divided and tried separately, but a given issue may not be tried by different, successive juries.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cowden Enterprises, Inc. v. East Coast Millwork Distributors
judgment entered in a class action, like any other judgment entered in a state judicial proceeding, is presumptively entitled to full faith and credit.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
Thrifty next relies upon Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. (7th Cir. 1995) 51 F.3d 1293 (Rhone-Poulenc), certiorari denied (1995) 516 U.S. 867 *442 [ 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 ], and Castano v. American Tobacco Co. (5th Cir. 1996) 84 F.3d 734 (Castano) to argue that certification of untested legal claims creates insurmountable pressure on the defendants to settle, even when the probability of an adverse judgment on the merits is low.
discussed
Cited "see"
Haughie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Tobacco Co., 84 F.3d 734, 750 (5th Cir. 1996); accord Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1303 (7th Cir.) (“The right to a jury trial in federal civil cases, conferred by the Seventh Amendment, is a right to have juriable issues determined by the first jury impaneled to hear them (provided there are no errors warranting a new trial), and not reexamined by another finder of fact.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Duratherm, Inc. v. Onsite Technology LLC
See Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1551 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Sears Retiree Group Life Insurance Litigation
See Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1302 (7th Cir.) (holding that when dissecting a ease into separate issues for resolution, “the district judge must carve at the joint.”), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
F & G Scrolling Mouse, L.L.C. v. IBM Corp.
See Wright, supra at 512 (p. 110, 1999 Pocket Part), citing Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1303 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995); Castano v. American Tobacco Co., 84 F.3d 734 (5th Cir. 1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Standard Manufacturing Co. v. United States
See Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1549-50 (Fed.Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Ford Motor Co. Vehicle Paint Litigation
See Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1300 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995) (federal court may not amalgamate state law differences on the law of negligence into an Esperanto jury instruction)..
discussed
Cited "see"
Enzo Apa & Son, Inc. v. Geapag A.G.
See Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1551 , 35 USPQ2d 1065, 1074 (Fed.Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995). 6 In order to adjudicate Enzo's appeal on the standing issue, we must trace the chain of title to the patent.
cited
Cited "see"
Enzo APA & Son, Inc. v. Geapag A.G.
See Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co., 56 F.3d 1538, 1551 , 35 USPQ2d 1065, 1074 (Fed.Cir.) (in banc), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
will bar the right of the other cotenants to recover.
See Matsushita Electric v. Epstein, 516 U.S. 867 , 373, 116 S.Ct. 873 , 134 L.Ed.2d 6 (1996); Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp., 456 U.S. 461, 481-82 , 102 S.Ct. 1883 , 72 L.Ed.2d 262 (1982); Licari v. City of Chicago, 298 F.3d 664, 666 (7th Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Dial Corp.
VII; see also In re Rhone-Poulenc Rover Inc., 51 F.3d 1293, 1303 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1985) (explaining that the Seventh Amendment protects the “right to have juriable [sic] issues determined by the first jury impaneled to hear them (provided there are no errors warranting a new trial), and not reexamined by another finder of fact”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation Limited
(2×)
See also Matter of Rhone-Poulenc, 51 F.3d 1293 (7th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 867 , 116 S.Ct. 184 , 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995). 50 By the same token, where the issues to be separately tried are separable and distinct, the Seventh Amendment rights of the parties are preserved as to both sets of issues.
Graham
v.
Mengel, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Ohio and Secretary of the Board of Bar Examiners
v.
Mengel, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Ohio and Secretary of the Board of Bar Examiners
No. 95-123.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. Florida (1) · Court of Appeals of South Caro… (1)
Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied.