green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995
2010
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Plocica v. Nylcare of Texas, Inc.
More to the point, “unless the court is persuaded that there has been a complete preemption, the court is not required to resolve the defensive preemption issues.” Id. at 567; see also Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 398 , 107 S.Ct. 2425 (“the fact that a defendant might ultimately prove that a plaintiffs claims are pre-empted ... does not establish that they are removable to federal court”).
cited
Cited "see"
Furstonberg v. Mintz
See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 354 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Byard v. QualMed Plans for Health, Inc.
See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 354 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995); 29 U.S.C. § 502 (a)(1)(B).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schmid v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Northwest
See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 357 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995) (medical malpractice claim for quality of benefit not preempted by ERISA); Corcoran v. United Healthcare, Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 , 113 S.Ct. 812 , 121 L.Ed.2d 684 (1992) (medical determinations made by an HMO preempted by ERISA because made in the context of benefits determination under the plan); Joss v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 88 F.3d 1482,1493 (7th Cir.1996) (ERISA preemption where plaintiff asserted negligen…
cited
Cited "see"
Jeffrey A. Mints v. Educational Testing Service
See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 355 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995); Warner v. Ford Motor Co., 46 F.3d 531, 535 (6th Cir.1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Santitoro v. Evans
See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350, 357 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brawn v. Coleman
See 185 F.3d at 4-5 (analyzing the distinction in the context of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.); see also Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, 57 F.3d 350, 354-55 (3d Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1009 , 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
John Joyce v. Rjr Nabisco Holdings Corp. Rjr Nabisco, Inc. Nabisco Brands, Inc. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co
See also Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, 57 F.3d 350, 353 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 564 , 133 L.Ed.2d 489 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Connors
v.
Sterling Milk Co.
v.
Sterling Milk Co.
No. 95-381.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1995.
Published
Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.