green
Positive treatment
7.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Unga
(2×)
“The question [is] whether [the interrogating officer’s] statements were so manipulative or coercive that they deprived [the suspect] of his ability to make an unconstrained, autonomous decision to confess.” Miller, 796 F.2d at 605 ; see Unitéd States v. Baldwin, 60 F.3d 363, 365 (7th Cir. 1995) (“the proper test is whether the interrogator resorted to tactics that in the circumstances prevented the suspect from making a rational decision whether to confess or otherwise inculpate himself”), vacated on other grounds, 517 U.S. 1231 , 116 S. Ct. 1873 , 135 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Unga
(2×)
"The question ... [is] whether [the interrogating officer's] statements were so manipulative or coercive that they deprived [the suspect] of his ability to make an unconstrained, autonomous decision to confess." Miller, 796 F.2d at 605 ; see United States v. Baldwin, 60 F.3d 363, 365 (7th Cir.1995) ("the proper test is whether the interrogator resorted to tactics that in the circumstances prevented the suspect from making a rational decision whether to confess or otherwise inculpate himself"), vacated on other grounds, 517 U.S. 1231 , 116 S.Ct. 1873 , 135 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996), adhered to on rema…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramon Navarro
(2×)
See Baldwin v. United States, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1873 , 135 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Robert P. Krehl, Debtor-Appellant
See Baldwin v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 1873 , 135 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re M.H. (Slip Opinion)
See, e.g., United States v. D.F., 63 F.3d 671, 680 (7th Cir.1995), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 517 U.S. 1231 , 116 S.Ct. 1872 , 135 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); Luna v. Massachusetts, 354 F.3d 108, 111 (1st Cir.2004); Running v. United States, D.S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard A. Frederick, and Randolph W. Lenz, Karin Lenz, and Kcs Industries, Inc., Intervening
See, e.g., United States v. Baldwin, 60 F.3d 363, 365 (7th Cir.1995) (“This court ... has moved decisively to the position that appellate review of determinations of mixed questions of fact and law should be governed by the standard of clear error, and not by the de novo standard.”) (internal citations omitted), vacated, 517 U.S. 1231 , 116 S.Ct. 1873 , 135 L.Ed.2d 169 (1996); see also Mucha v. King, 792 F.2d 602, 605 (7th Cir.1986) (“[MJost courts treat legal characterizations (negligence, possession, ratification, principal place of business, etc.) as facts to which the clearly-erroneo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Union Security Life Insurance Co.
v.
Crocker
v.
Crocker
No. 95-740.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1996.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, ante, p. 559.