green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.5 score
“claimants have no right to a jury in admiralty actions, and thus lose their right to pursue common law remedies before a jury when forced into admiralty court under the limitation act.”
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re the Complaint of J.A.R. Barge Lines, L.P.
claimants have no right to a jury in admiralty actions, and thus lose their right to pursue common law remedies before a jury when forced into admiralty court under the limitation act.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University
(2×)
Id. at 359. 20 We believe that Devlin is dispositive, and that Biddle misreads Barajas.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States of America, Ex Rel., Paul Biddle v. Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford, Jr. University
Id. at 359.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benussi
Frank, 156 F.3d at 337 ; see United States v. Vebeliunas, 76 F.3d 1283, 1290 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 950 , 117 S.Ct. 362 , 136 L.Ed.2d 253 (1996). 158 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension And Retirement Fund
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Sinicropi, 84 F.3d 116, 117 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), affirming 887 F.Supp. 595, 617 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (denying award of fees requested pursuant to § 1132(g)(1) where "the action [did] not arise under ERISA" and the "defendants prevailed because of the [Railway Labor Act], and the rights provided by ERISA had no bearing on this case"), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 949 , 117 S.Ct. 360 , 136 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rocco v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund
See Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Sinicropi, 84 F.3d 116, 117 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), affirming 887 F.Supp. 595, 617 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (denying award of fees requested pursuant to § 1132(g)(1) where “the action [did] not arise under ERISA” and the “defendants prevailed because of the [Railway Labor Act], and the rights provided by ERISA had no bearing on this case”), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 949 , 117 S.Ct. 360 , 136 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996).
discussed
Cited "see"
Babitt v. Vebeliunas (In Re Vebeliunas)
See United States v. Vebeliunas, 76 F.3d 1283 (2nd Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 950 , 117 S.Ct. 362 , 136 L.Ed.2d 253 (1996), and denial of post-conviction relief affd. in part, vacated in part, 164 F.3d 620 (2nd Cir.1998). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Hamilton and Nicola Messere, Also Known as Supercop
The term “retroactive misjoinder” refers to circumstances in which the “joinder of multiple counts was proper initially, but later developments — such as a district court’s dismissal of some counts for lack of evidence or an appellate court’s reversal of less than all convictions — render the initial joinder improper.” United States v. Jones, 16 F.3d 487, 493 (2d Cir.1994); see, e.g., United States v. Vebeliunas, 76 F.3d 1283, 1293-94 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 950 , 117 S.Ct. 362 , 136 L.Ed.2d 253 (1996); United States v. Novod, 927 F.2d 726, 728 (2d Cir.), cert. denied…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pruitt
v.
National Casualty Insurance Co.
v.
National Casualty Insurance Co.
No. 96-313.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1996.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
App. Ct. Ill., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.