green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Marya S. Norman-Bloodsaw v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Id. at 873.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kanuszewski v. Mich. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.
Dist. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 , 656-58, 115 S.Ct. 2386 , 132 L.Ed.2d 564 , (1995) (same); see Yin v. State of California, 95 F.3d 864 , 874 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997) (O'Scannlain, J., concurring) ("certain aspects of the routine physical examination at issue here would implicate the requisite 'concerns about bodily integrity,' " and thus trigger protection under the Fourth Amendment); Earls, 122 S.Ct. at 2564 (finding school policy of urine testing a "governmental search" but "reasonable") ).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Paul Williams, Township of Lakewood
See Yin v. California, 95 F.3d 864, 868 (9th Cir. 1996) (observing that an employer cannot require an employee to undergo a medical examination unless the employee's "problems have had a substantial and injurious impact on [the] employee's job performance"), certif. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S. Ct. 955 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Swenson v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.
Accord Poly v. Moylan, 423 Mass. 141, 151 , 667 N.E.2d 250 , 257 (1996) (attorney malpractice may have constituted negligence, but did not rise to the level of an unfair or deceptive act or practice), cert denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 843 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 01-5098
Dist. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646, 656-58 , 115 S.Ct. 2386 , 132 L.Ed.2d 564 (1995) (same); see Yin v. State of California, 95 F.3d 864, 874 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997) (O'Scannlain, J., concurring) ("certain aspects of the routine physical examination at issue here would implicate the requisite `concerns about bodily integrity,'" and thus trigger protection under the Fourth Amendment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.
Dist. 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646, 656-58 , 115 S.Ct. 2386 , 132 L.Ed.2d 564 (1995) (same); see Yin v. State of California, 95 F.3d 864, 874 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997) (O’Scannlain, J., concurring) (“certain aspects of the routine physical examination at issue here would implicate the requisite ‘concerns about bodily integrity,’ ” and thus trigger protection under the Fourth Amendment).
cited
Cited "see"
Vera L. Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Mike Black Rita Silva
See Yin v. California, 95 F.3d 864, 867 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gainor v. Douglas County, Georgia
(2×)
See Riley v. Newton, 94 F.3d 632, 635 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).- Deputy *1290 Bearden’s alleged unlawful use of force occurred before the backup officers arrived.
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. CITY OF ALBANY, GEORGIA
See Riley v. Newton, 94 F.3d 632, 638-639 (11th Cir.1996), cert. denied 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris Custom Builders, Inc. v. Hoffmeyer
(2×)
See Harris Custom Builders, Inc. v. Hoffmeyer, 92 F.3d 517 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Duda v. Board of Education of Franklin Park Public School District No. 84, John Barry, Dan Pietrini
See Yin v. State of California, 95 F.3d 864, 867-68 (9th Cir.1996) (concluding that, in light of the business necessity exception of the ADA, “when health problems have had a substantial and injurious impact on an employee’s job performance, the employer can require the employee to undergo a physical examination designed to determine his or her ability to work, even if the examination might disclose whether the employee is disabled or the extent of any disability”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marobie-FL, Inc. v. National Ass'n of Fire Equip. Distributors and Northwest Nexus, Inc.
(2×)
See Harris Custom Builders, Inc. v. Hoffmeyer, 92 F.3d 517, 519 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schnake v. Johnson County Community College
See Yin v. State of Cal., 95 F.3d 864, 868 (9th Cir.1996) (“when health problems have had a substantial and injurious impact on an employee’s job performance, the employer can require the employee to undergo a physical examination designed to determine his or her ability to work, even if the examination might disclose whether the employee is disabled or the extent of any disability”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
McDonald v. Raytheon Aircraft Corp.
See 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (d)(1), (d)(4)(A); see generally, Yin v. State of California, 95 F.3d 864, 867-69 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that employer may compel an employee with excessive absences to undergo a fitness-for-duty medical examination under the business necessity exception), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Long Term Care Pharmacy Alliance v. Ferguson
Both beneficiaries and providers (such as LTCPA, on behalf of its members) have standing to assert a Section 1983 private action against state officials for violations of federal statutory rights such as those claimed by LTCPA. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ; see also Visiting Nurse Ass’n of N. Shore, Inc. v. Bullen, 93 F.3d 997, 1002 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997) (expressly finding providers have standing to assert Section 1983 actions involving reimbursement rates); Westside Mothers v. Haveman, 289 F.3d 852 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, — U.S.-,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Russo
See, e.g., Yin v. California, 95 F.3d 864, 871 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S. Ct. 955 , 136 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Manning v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 505
(2×)
Community for Creative Nom-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730, 737 , 109 S.Ct. 2166 , 104 L.Ed.2d 811 (1989); see also Harris Custom Builders, Inc. v. Hoffmeyer, 92 F.3d 517, 519 (7th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1114 , 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leon
See, e.g., United States v. Hairston, 96 F.3d 102, 109 (4th Cir.1996) (citing eases and discussing timing and motive factors in measuring whether acceptance of responsibility is extraordinary), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 843 (1997); United States v. Miller, 991 F.2d 552, 553 (9th Cir.1993) (restitution-ary “payment had to have been genuinely voluntary, rather than motivated 'primarily by a collateral consideration such as the desire to settle [a] civil lawsuit”) (emphasis added) (Kozinski, J.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hoffer
See, e.g., United States v. Hairston, 96 F.3d 102, 107-08 (4th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 117 S. Ct. 956 (1997) (holding that payment of restitution can, in exceptional circumstances, be basis for departure from sentencing guidelines); Hendrickson, 22 F.3d at 176 (comparing forfeiture to voluntary payment of restitution and concluding that, unlike the payment of restitution, under no circumstances can forfeiture be the basis of a departure from the sentencing guidelines).4 For the reasons set forth above, we hold that civil forfeiture can never be the basis for a downward departur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hoffer
See, e.g., United States v. Hairston, 96 F.3d 102, 107-08 (4th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 956 , 136 L.Ed.2d 843 (1997) (holding that payment of restitution can, in exceptional circumstances, be basis for departure from sentencing guidelines); Hendrickson, 22 F.3d at 176 (comparing forfeiture to voluntary payment of restitution and concluding that, unlike the payment of restitution, under no circumstances can forfeiture be the basis *1204 of a departure from the sentencing guidelines). 4 For the reasons set forth above, we hold that civil forfeiture can never be the basis f…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moody Emergency Medical Service, Inc. v. City of Millbrook
See also Visiting Nurse Assoc, of North Shore, Inc. v. Bullen, 93 F.3d 997 , 1003 n. 5 (1st Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 955 , 136 L.Ed.2d 842 (1997) ("Congress intend that § 1320a-2 serve to resurrect the Wilder test, with no Suter overlay”); Stanberry v. Sherman, 75 F.3d 581, 583-584 (10th Cir.1996) ("Basically, the Congress disavowed Suter’s approach....
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris Custom Builders, Inc.
v.
Hoffmeyer
v.
Hoffmeyer
No. 96-938.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 18, 1997.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.