green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Joe Wilson, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian Mayhew, Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Westminster Fire Fighters Association, Local 2425 Joe Wilson International Association of Fire Fighters, Afl-Cio, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian Mayhew, Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Westminster Fire Fighters Association, Local 2425 International Association of Fire Fighters, Afl-Cio Joe Wilson, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian Mayhew
But see Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 878-79 (9th Cir.1996) (reviewing for plain error when the appellant failed to file a motion for directed verdict in the trial court and reversing the judgment when there was no evidence to support the jury's verdict), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). 13 Defendants argue that Garrison's statement was recklessly false and, for that reason, should not be deemed to address a matter of public concern.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Gilbrook v. City of Westminster
But see Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 878-79 (9th Cir.1996) (reviewing for plain error when the appellant failed to file a motion for directed verdict in the trial court and reversing the judgment when there was no evidence to support the jury’s verdict), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). .
cited
Cited "see"
Ventura Mobilehome Communities Owners Association, an Unincorporated Association v. City of San Buenaventura
See Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 875 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Prickett v. Amoco Oil Co.
See Lusk, 238 F.3d at 1241 , citing Thompson v. Holy Family Hosp., 121 F.3d 537, 540 (9th Cir.1997) (finding twenty-five-pound lifting restriction not substantially limiting on its face) and Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys, Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , 349 (4th Cir.1996) (holding, as a matter of law, that a twenty-five pound lifting limitation does not substantially limit the performance of any major life activity), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); accord Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (same); Hacker v. City…
cited
Cited "see"
Ihekwu v. City of Durham, NC
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , 348 (4th Cir.1996) (per curiam), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bissell v. Reno
Because she has not established a prima facie case, “it is unnecessary to address the question of reasonable accommodation.” Id.; see Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Systems, Inc. 101 F.3d 346 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied sub nom Williams v. Avnet, Inc., 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nowlin v. K Mart Corp.
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , (4th Cir.1996) (25-pound restriction), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hoskins v. Oakland County Sheriff's Department
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346, 349 (4th Cir.1996) (declaring, as a matter of law, that a 25-pound lifting limitation "does not constitute a significant restriction on one’s ability to lift, work, or perform any other major life activity”), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1240 , 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). see also Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (holding that a 25-pound lifting restriction did not substan *890 tially limit any major life activities); Ray v. Glidden Co., 85 F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir.1996) (c…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark Frederick Durbin v. City of Seattle C. Kimi Kondo James Jackson
See Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). 3 AFFIRMED. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barnard v. ADM Milling Co., Inc.
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , (4th Cir.1996) (25-pound restriction), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (U.S.1997); Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cynthia Thompson v. Holy Family Hospital, a Division of Dominican Health Services
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 , 349 (4th Cir.1996) (declaring, as a matter of law, that a 25-pound lifting limitation “does not constitute a significant restriction on one’s ability to lift, work, or perform any other major life activity”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). see also Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311, 1319 (8th Cir.1996) (holding that a 25-pound lifting restriction did not substantially limit any major life activities); Ray v. Glidden Co., 85 F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir.1996) (concludi…
discussed
Cited "see"
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
See Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., Inc., 101 F.3d 346 (4th Cir.1996) (“[W]e hold, as a matter of law, that a twenty-five pound lifting limitation— *280 particularly when compared to an average person’s abilities — does not constitute a significant restriction on one’s ability to lift, work, or perform any other major life activity.”), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); Aucutt v. Six Flags Over Mid-America, Inc., 85 F.3d 1311 (8th Cir.1996) (same); Ray v. Glidden Co., 85 F.3d 227 (5th Cir.1996) (same); but see Lowe v. Angelo’s Italian F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Avila Edmond Dadisho v. Seal a and City of Los Angeles Los Angeles Police Department Willie Williams, Chief of Police
In order to prevail at trial, the officers were required to prove that the government action taken against them was "clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, having no substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare." See Sinaloa Lake Owners Association v. Simi Valley, 882 F.2d 1398, 1407 (9th Cir.1989) (as amended), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1016 , 110 S.Ct. 1317 , 108 L.Ed.2d 493 (1990); see also Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir.1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997). 1 7 At oral argument, counsel for the officers concede…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valle v. City of Chicago
See, e.g., Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys., 101 F.3d 346 , 349 (4th Cir.1996), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1844 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); Ray v. Glidden Co., 85 F.3d 227, 229 (5th Cir.1996). 6 These cases seem to assume, without explanation, that only a narrow range of jobs require heavy lifting.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kim v. United States
See also Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir.1996) (to establish a violation of substantive due process, “a plaintiff is ordinarily required to prove that a challenged government action was ‘clearly arbitrary and unreasonable, having no substantial relation to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare.’ ”) (quoting Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 365, 395 , 47 S.Ct. 114, 120 , 71 L.Ed. 303 (1926)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 1845 , 137 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1997); Kawaoka v. City of Arroyo Grande, 17 F.3d 1227, 1233 (9th Cir.1994) (“Legislative acts that do n…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grooms
v.
Glaze
v.
Glaze
No. 96-1524.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 27, 1997.
Published
Sup. Ct. S. C. Certiorari denied.