green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Feinberg
See General Trading, Incorporated v. Yale Materials Handling Corporation, 119 F.3d 1485 ,1501 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1380 , 140 L.Ed.2d 526 (1998) (Creditors’ concerns for protecting themselves against other creditors’ obtaining disproportionate share of debtor’s assets is proper purpose for filing an involuntary petition.).
cited
Cited "see"
West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
See Complaint of Consolidation Coal Co., 123 F.3d 126, 131 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1380 , 140 L.Ed.2d 526 (1998); see also Sieck v. Russo, 869 F.2d 131, 134 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
See Complaint of Consolidation Coal Co., 123 F.3d 126, 131 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 118 S.Ct. 1380 , 140 L.Ed.2d 526 (1998); see also Sieck v. Russo, 869 F.2d 131, 134 (2d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Systems Communications, Inc.
See General Trading, Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp., 119 F.3d 1485 (11th Cir.1997), cert. denied — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1380 , 140 L.Ed.2d 526 (1998) (Counterclaims only serve to set off amounts owing on the claim but they do not render the claim subject to a bona fide dispute.); Faberge Restaurant of Florida, Inc., 222 B.R. 385 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1997); In re Manhattan Industries, Inc., 224 B.R. 195 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1997) (Although counterclaim might diminish the value of the claim, it does not put the validity of the claim in issue.) The Debtor’s second argument, that the obligation is not…
discussed
Cited "see"
Dao v. Knightsbridge International Reinsurance Corp.
See Complaint of Consolidation Coal Co., 123 F.3d 126, 132 (3d Cir.1997) (noting that because admiralty claims are not brought at common law, Seventh Amendment does not apply to admiralty claims, and that there is no right to a jury trial in admiralty claims), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1380 , 140 L.Ed.2d 526 (1998); Concordia Co., Inc. v. Panek, 115 F.3d 67, 72 (1st Cir.1997) (noting that one important factor in determining whether a claimant has elected to proceed in admiralty is whether he demanded a jury trial); 29 Moore’s Federal Practice § 704.09[2] (noting relationship betwe…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Newman
v.
Consolidation Coal Co.
v.
Consolidation Coal Co.
No. 97-1234.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1998.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed as a seaman granted. Certiorari denied.