green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.1 score
“a plan fiduciary may violate its duties ... either by affirmatively misleading plan participants about the operations of a plan, or by remaining silent in circumstances where silence could be misleading.”
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Dynegy, Inc. ERISA Litigation
a plan fiduciary may violate its duties ... either by affirmatively misleading plan participants about the operations of a plan, or by remaining silent in circumstances where silence could be misleading.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
See State v. Bourque, 96-0842 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 1 , cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Duane L. Christensen, Plaintiffappellant v. The Qwest Pension Plan
See Schmidt v. Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund, 128 F.3d 541 , 546-48 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1513 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998); Hart v. Equitable Life Assur.
cited
Cited "see"
Duane L. Christensen v. Qwest Pension Plan
See Schmidt v. Sheet Metal Workers’ Nat’l Pension Fund, 128 F.3d 541 , 546-48 (7th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1073 (1998); Hart v. Equitable Life Assur.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Turner
See State v. Bourque, 96-0842, p. 15 (La.7/1/97), 699 So.2d 1, 11 , cert. denied sub nom., Bourque v. Louisiana, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998) (court may "enter any appropriate order to remedy a party's violation of a discovery right")(citing State v. Seals, 95-0395, p. 14 (La.11/25/96), 684 So.2d 368, 378 , cert. denied sub nom., Seals v. Louisiana, 520 U.S. 1199 , 117 S.Ct. 1558 , 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallagher Corp. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
See Schmidt v. Sheet Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund, 128 F.3d 541, 547 (7th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1513 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998); Pohl v. National Benefits Consultants, Inc., 956 F.2d 126, 129 (7th Cir.1992) (“ERISA makes the existence of discretion a sine qua non of fiduciary duty.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Westchester Media Co. v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.
See Wenner v. Texas Lottery Com’n., 123 F.3d 321 , 325 (5th Cir.1997), cert, denied, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998) (citing Hecht v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329 , 64 S.Ct. 587, 591 , 88 L.Ed. 754 (1944)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark
(2×)
See also State v. Bourque, 96-0842, pp. 13-14 (La. 7/1/97), 699 So.2d 1, 10-11 , cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1073 , 118 S.Ct. 1514 , 140 L.Ed.2d 667 (1998) (wherein this' court held that testimony, regarding an incident in which the defendant used extremely derogatory language toward the victim and her co-worker, was not offered as evidence of other crimes nor was it offered as an inculpatory statement; rather, the testimony went to the character and propensities of the defendant, an area clearly relevant and within the proper scope of a capital sentencing hearing under LSA-C.Cr.P. art. 905.2).
Zehner
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
No. 97-1286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
523 U.S. 1073
0. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.