green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 9×
9.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davidson v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Woods v. Miamisburg City Schools
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schaefer v. United States Postal Service
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Sain v. American Red Cross
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United Food & Commercial Workers, Local Union 1099 v. City of Sidney
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nilavar v. Mercy Health System-Western Ohio
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wallace v. Henderson
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Parrish v. HBO & Co.
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.
in considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, the court is required to take as true all factual allegations in the complaint.
discussed
Cited "see"
Perez v. Wade
See Barrett v. Harrington, 130 F.3d 246, 253 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998). (court has discretion as to whether to consider matters outside the pleadings); Gauntner v. Boyle, 554 F.Supp.2d 779, 780-81 (N.D.Ohio 2008) (it is within the court’s discretion to consider matters outside the pleadings, although doing so converts the motion to one for summary judgment). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Cleveland Brown v. Michael J. Crowley
(2×)
See Barrett v. Harrington, 130 F.3d 246, 254-55 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998).
examined
Cited "see"
Straight v. Wyoming Department of Transportation (In Re Straight)
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Welfare (In re Sacred Heart Hosp.), 133 F.3d 237, 243 (3d Cir.1998) (in enacting § 106(a), Congress unequivocally expressed its intent to abrogate the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity); accord Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury (In re Creative Goldsmiths of Washington, D.C., Inc.), 119 F.3d 1140, 1145 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998).
cited
Cited "see"
Wanda Sowards v. Loudon County, Tennessee and Timothy Guider, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Loudon County, Tennessee
See Barrett v. Harrington, 130 F.3d 246, 262 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998); Ratliff v. Wellington Exempted Village Sch.
discussed
Cited "see"
University of Virginia v. Robertson
See Schlossberg v. Maryland, {“Schlossberg”) 119 F.3d 1140 , 1145-46 (4th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998) (dismissing an adversary proceeding that argued taxes paid to the state were a preference and, also, finding no evidence that the abrogation effort was pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment, especially “when a specific, substantive Article I power clearly enabled the law.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sue Fritz v. Charter Township of Comstock
Although we have previously recognized that in some cases “injury based on embarrassment, humiliation, and emotional *500 distress” is sufficient to be actionable under § 1983, see Bloch v. Ribar, 156 F.3d 673, 679-80 (6th Cir.1998); see also Barrett v. Harrington, 130 F.3d 246 (6th Cir.1997), ce rt. denied, 523 U.S. 1075 , 118 S.Ct. 1517 , 140 L.Ed.2d 670 (1998), we find that such circumstances did not exist in the present case.
Barrett
v.
Harrington
v.
Harrington
No. 97-1362.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1998.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (9)
0. A. 6th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.