green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.
A verdict 24 13‐561 Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc. 1 form ʺmust be read in conjunction with the judgeʹs charge to the jury.ʺ 2 Vichare v. AMBAC, Inc., 106 F.3d 457, 466 (2d Cir. 1996); Shah v. Pan Am. 3 World Svcs., Inc., 148 F.3d 84 , 96 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 4 (1999); accord Lore, 670 F.3d at 159–60.
cited
Cited "see"
George Brown v. Brenda Umstattd
See Johnson v. City of Minneapolis, 152 F.3d 859, 862 (8th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 , 119 S.Ct. 1035 , 143 L.Ed.2d 43 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. City Hospital, Inc.
(2×)
See Kessel v. Leavitt, 204 W.Va. 95, 144 , 511 S.E.2d 720, 769 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 , 119 S.Ct. 1035 , 143 L.Ed.2d 43 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.
See Blackner v. Continen *432 tal Airlines, 311 N.J.Super. 10 , 709 A.2d 258, 260 (App.Div.1998) (dismissing breach-of-contract claims arising from $60 surcharge to replace lost ticket), certification denied, 156 N.J. 405 , 719 A.2d 637 (1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 , 119 S.Ct. 1034 , 143 L.Ed.2d 42 (1999); Boon Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. Pike
See also Johnson v. City of Minneapolis, 152 F.3d. 859, 862 (8th Cir.) (to state equal protection claim, plaintiff must establish he was treated differently from others similarly situated), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Interest of T.A.W., L.J.W., M.M.W., J.M.W., Minor Children
See Lide, 116 S.W.3d at 158 (indicating that the trial court’s finding was not supported by the record when the requesting parent failed to segregate, itemize, or explain the particularized needs of the children); see also Nordstrom v. Nordstrom, 965 S.W.2d 575 , 579–80 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, pet. denied), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 (1999) (indicating Mother’s conflicting testimony as to whether the child’s portion of expenses were segregated from the Mother’s was insufficient to support Mother’s request to increase child support).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Brandon L. v. Moats
(2×)
And underpinning all of these statutes is "a recognition, which varies from State to State, that children should have the opportunity to benefit from relationships with statutorily specified personsfor example, their grandparents." 530 U.S. at 64 , 120 S.Ct. 2054 ; see also Kessel v. Leavitt, 204 W.Va. 95, 197 , 511 S.E.2d 720, 822 (1998) (stating that "[i]n recent years, the recognized rights of grandparents have continued to expand through *687 both statutory definition and judicial interpretation"), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1142 , 119 S.Ct. 1035 , 143 L.Ed.2d 43 (1999).
Smith, Individually and on Behalf of All Beneficiaries of Allen
v.
American Isuzu Motors, Inc.
v.
American Isuzu Motors, Inc.
No. 98-898.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1999.
525 U.S. 1142
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.