green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert Glen Coe v. Ricky Bell, Warden
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Under this test, a state court’s decision will be considered an unreasonable application of clearly established Supreme Court precedent if it is not “debatable among reasonable jurists” or is “so offensive to existing precedent, so devoid of record support, or so arbitrary, as to indicate that it is outside the universe of plausible, credible outcomes.” Id. at 362 (quotations omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phillips v. City of South Bend (In Re Phillips)
See In re Towers, 162 F.3d 952, 956 (7th Cir.1998) (“[S]tate law-enforcement actions are outside the scope of the stay to begin with.”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999). *741 The court also finds that the City was acting pursuant to its police or regulatory power and not to protect its status as a creditor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Singleton v. Carter
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 371 (6th Cir.) (explaining that “Brecht’s [deferential standard] quite precisely captures Congress’s intent as expressed in AEDPA and, therefore, continues to be applicable”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warfel v. City of Saratoga (In Re Warfel)
(2×)
See In re Towers, 162 F.3d 952, 954-56 (7th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Wheeler v. Kurt Jones
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Calvin Whitmore v. Mike Kemna, Superintendent Jeremiah (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General of the State of Missouri
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 371 (6th Cir.) (“We think that when the issue before the federal habeas court is the state court’s finding of harmless error, the test set out by the Supreme Court in Kotteakos and explicitly reiterated in Brecht quite precisely captures Congress’s intent as expressed in AEDPA and, therefore, continues to be applicable.”), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Gibson
See Bryson v. Ward, 187 F.3d 1193 , 1199 n. 3 (10th Cir.1999) (citing Matteo v. Superintendent, 171 F.3d 877, 885-91 (3d Cir.1999), petition for cert. filed, 67 U.S.L.W. 3008 (U.S. June 22, 1999) (No. 98-2050), and Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 357-62 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999), which set forth the various interpretations of the standards of deference afforded state court adjudications under both § 2254(d)(l)’s “contrary to” and “unreasonable application of’ language by other federal courts of appeals).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kevin King v. David Trippett
See Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999); Harpster v. Ohio, 128 F.3d 322, 326 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robinson v. Gundy
See also Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 362 (6th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999), abrogated on other grounds by Harris v. Stovall, 212 F.3d 940 (6th Cir.2000). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank Lordi v. Todd Ishee, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 373-74 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Anderson
See also King v. Trippett, 192 F.3d 517, 520 (6th Cir.1999) (citing Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352, 357 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999) and Harpster v. Ohio, 128 F.3d 322, 326 (6th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1112 , 118 S.Ct. 1044 , 140 L.Ed.2d 109 (1998)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robertson v. Abramajtys
See also Harris v. Stovall, 212 F.3d 940 (6th Cir.2000) (applying the Williams standard and abrogating the “reasonable jurist” standard set forth in Nevers v. Killinger, 169 F.3d 352 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999)). *836 In determining whether the state court decision was “contrary to,” or an “unreasonable application of’ federal law, the AEDPA specifically limits the source of law to “clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.” As explained by the Sixth Circuit, This provision marks a significant chan…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowling v. Parker
See, e.g., Nevers v. Killinger, 990 F.Supp. 844, 849-50 (E.D.Mich.1997), aff 'd 169 F.3d 352 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Reinsurance Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
See, e.g., Fleet Bank, Nat’l Assoc. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 893 (2d Cir.1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Reinsurance Company, Ltd. v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company
See, e.g., Fleet Bank, Nat'l Assoc. v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 893 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 144 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Nixon
See also Fleet Bank, National Association v. Burke, 160 F.3d 883, 887-88 (2nd Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 527 U.S. 1004 , 119 S.Ct. 2340 , 144 L.Ed.2d 237 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cutright
v.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., dba Metlife
v.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., dba Metlife
No. 98-1656.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 1999.
Published
Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Certiorari denied.