green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.9 score
“in a cat's paw situation, the harasser clearly causes the tangible employment action, regardless of which individual actually signs the employee's walking papers.”
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McWeeny v. City of Hartford
. . . speaks of'any individual,' courts long ago concluded that title vii is directed at, and only protects, employees and potential employees
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Harlow v. Potter
in a cat's paw situation, the harasser clearly causes the tangible employment action, regardless of which individual actually signs the employee's walking papers.
cited
Cited "see"
Cobb v. Syniverse Technologies, Inc.
See Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Inc., 163 F.3d 1236 , 1249 (11th Cir.1998), cert denied, 528 U.S. 930 , 120 S.Ct. 327 , 145 L.Ed.2d 255 (1999); Gee v. Principi, 289 F.3d 342, 346 (5th Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coles v. Street
See Chiropractic America v. Lavecchia, 180 F.3d 99, 103 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 930 , 120 S.Ct. 327 , 145 L.Ed.2d 255 (1999) (quoting Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1 , 11 n. 9, 107 S.Ct. 1519 , 95 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987)).
cited
Cited "see"
Lottinger v. Shell Oil Co.
See Sloop v. ABTCO, Inc., 178 F.3d 1285 , 1999 WL 280281 , at *1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 930 , 120 S.Ct. 327 , 145 L.Ed.2d 255 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Demasse
v.
ITT Corp., dba ITT Cannon
v.
ITT Corp., dba ITT Cannon
No. 99-235.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (1) · D. Maine (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.