green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Feliz
(2×)
See Landry v. Attorney Gen ., 429 Mass. 336 , 350, 709 N.E.2d 1085 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000) (upholding mandatory, minimally invasive deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] searches for identification purposes as constitutional for convicted persons with low expectations of privacy in their identity).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lockley v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
(2×)
See Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dep't, 174 F. 3d 95, 124 (3d Cir.1999) (applying Cavuoti and holding that trial judge's failure to properly instruct jury regarding upper management requirement constituted reversible error), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1074 , 120 S.Ct. 786 , 145 L.Ed. 2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whittaker v. Fayette County
See Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dep’t., 174 F.3d 95,110 (3d Cir.1999) (holding, in the context of a Title VII action, that “evidence of harassment of other women and widespread sexism is also probative of ‘whether one of the principal nondiseriminatory reasons asserted by [an employer] for its actions was in fact a pretext for ... discrimination.’ ”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1074 , 120 S.Ct. 786 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000); Burks v. Oklahoma Pub.
cited
Cited "see"
Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York
See New York v. Seneca Nation of Indians, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management v. United States
See Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 913 (8th Cir.1997), aff'd, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Department Of Environmental Management v. United States
See Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 913 (8th Cir.1997), aff'd, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Esmizadeh
See Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. de *387 nied, 528 U.S. 1078 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000), citing Bates v. Long Island Railroad Co., 997 F.2d 1028, 1037 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 992 , 114 S.Ct. 550 , 126 L.Ed.2d 452 (1993) (District Court for the Western District of New York found no authority for broadening of the doctrine to include seemingly inconsistent legal positions).
discussed
Cited "see"
Singleton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Singleton)
(2×)
Accord, In re Collins, 173 F.3d 924 , 929 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000); Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 782 (1st Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989)(“In support of this ‘injunction,’ the district court necessarily had the power to enforce the order, at any point while the order was in effect, including periods after judgment.”); In re Glannon, 245 B.R. 882, 887 (D.Kan.2000); Speleos v. McCarthy, 201 B.R. 325, 329 (D.D.C.1996); In re Leach, 194 B.R. 812, 815 (E.D.Mic…
discussed
Cited "see"
Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians v. New York
See Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam), aff'g 26 F.Supp.2d 555 (W.D.N.Y.1998), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); see, e.g., Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 614 , 103 S.Ct. 1382 , 75 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983) (holding that tribes’ intervention in action brought by United States against states does not violate Eleventh Amendment because “[t]he Tribes do not seek to bring new claims or issues against the states”).
examined
Cited "see"
Straight v. Wyoming Department of Transportation (In Re Straight)
(4×)
See Virginia v. Collins (In re Collins), 173 F.3d 924 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000) (finding that a motion to reopen and determine that a debt was discharged was not a "suit" against a state that implicated the Eleventh Amendment); Maryland v. Antonelli Creditors' Liquidating Trust, 123 F.3d 777 (4th Cir.1997) (a confirmation order was not a "suit" against the state); University of Va. v. Robertson, 243 B.R. 657, 662-65 (W.D.Va.2000) (concluding that an adversary proceeding to determine the dischargeability of a student loan was a "suit" as …
cited
Cited "see"
University of Virginia v. Robertson
See Virginia v. Collins, 173 F.3d 924 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — • U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 785 , - L.Ed.2d - (2000) (No. 99-380).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tarr v. Ciasulli
(2×)
Failla v. City of Passaic, 146 F.3d 149, 158 (1998) (“[W]e predict that the New Jersey Supreme Court would find that an employee aids and abets a violation of the LAD when he [or she] knowingly gives substantial assistance or encouragement to the unlawful conduct of [the] employer.”); see also Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dep’t, 174 F.3d 95, 129 (3d Cir.1999) (predicting that New Jersey courts would impose aiding and abetting liability only on supervisory employees), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1074 , 120 S.Ct. 786 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Of Connecticut Department Of Environmental Protection v. Occupational Safety And Health Administration
See, e.g., Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 912-14 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that state sovereign immunity did not bar an Indian tribe's action against Minnesota because the United States had intervened and sought the same relief as the tribe) (discussed in Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555, 564 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000)). 31 Connecticut's sovereign immunity does not bar OSHA from intervening as a party in a case originally brought by a private citizen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration
See, e.g., Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 912-14 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that state sovereign immunity did not bar an Indian tribe’s action against Minnesota because the United States had intervened and sought the same relief as the tribe) (discussed in Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555, 564 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DLC
(2×)
See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 411.143 (c)(3) (requiring personal identification information to be removed prior to establishing a population statistics database, etc.); see also Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1095-96 (Mass.1999) (holding that where DNA Act provides safeguards against wrongful use of DNA information and limits purposes for which DNA records may be distributed, plaintiffs' speculation that data may be used wrongfully is contrary to language of Act), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re D.L.C.
(2×)
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 411.143(c)(3) (requiring personal identification information to be removed prior to establishing a population statistics database, etc.); see also Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1095-96 (Mass.1999) (holding that where DNA Act provides safeguards against wrongful use of DNA information and limits purposes for which DNA records may be distributed, plaintiffs’ speculation that data may be used wrongfully is contrary to language of Act), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rudolph v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.
See, e.g., Hurley v. Atlantic City Police Dep’t, 174 F.3d 95, 126 (3d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1074 , 120 S.Ct. 786 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000); Santiago v. Vineland, 107 F.Supp.2d 512 (D.N.J.2000)(Orlofsky, J.); Newsome v. Administrative Office of Courts of State of New Jersey, 103 F.Supp.2d 807 (D.N.J.2000) (Greenaway, J.); Mobley v. City of Atlantic City Police Dep’t, 89 F.Supp.2d 533 (D.N.J.1999)(Simandle, J.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re LTV Steel Co., Inc.
(2×)
See also Va. v. Collins (In re Collins), 173 F.3d 924 , 929-31 (4th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1079 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000) (holding that adversary proceeding seeking to determine dischargeability of debt owed to a state is not a suit against the state for Eleventh Amendment purposes); Tex. v. Walker, 142 F.3d 813 , 821-23 (5th Cir.1998), ce rt. denied, 525 U.S. 1102 , 119 S.Ct. 865 , 142 L.Ed.2d 768 (1999) (holding that Eleventh Amendment does not prevent the *471 discharge of a debt owed to a state); State of Md. v. Antonelli Creditors’ Liquidating Trust, 123 F.3d …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VIRGINIA
v.
Herbert Martell COLLINS
v.
Herbert Martell COLLINS
No. 99-380.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.