green
Positive treatment
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Feliz
See Landry v. Attorney Gen ., 429 Mass. 336 , 350, 709 N.E.2d 1085 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000) (upholding mandatory, minimally invasive deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] searches for identification purposes as constitutional for convicted persons with low expectations of privacy in their identity).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Lunden
See Landry v. Attorney Gen., 429 Mass. 336, 339 (1999), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1073 (2000). 6 It should be noted that when G.
cited
Cited "see"
Amato v. District Attorney for Cape & Islands District
See Landry v. Attorney Gen., 429 Mass. 336 , 354 n.20 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 (2000) (upholding State convicted offender database created by G.
discussed
Cited "see"
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Board
See Landry v. Attorney Gen., 429 Mass. 336, 347 (1999), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1073 (2000) (upholding statutory scheme and stating that DNA database intended to “presence] a permanent identification record of convicted persons for resolving past and future crimes”).
cited
Cited "see"
Student No. 9 v. Board of Education
See Landry v. Attorney Gen., 429 Mass. 336, 343 (1999), cert, denied, 528 U.S. 1073 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Blixt v. Blixt
See Landry v. Attorney Gen., 429 Mass. 336, 343 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York
See New York v. Seneca Nation of Indians, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management v. United States
See Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 913 (8th Cir.1997), aff'd, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rhode Island Department Of Environmental Management v. United States
See Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 913 (8th Cir.1997), aff'd, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Singleton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Singleton)
Accord, In re Collins, 173 F.3d 924 , 929 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000); Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc., 858 F.2d 775, 782 (1st Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, 488 U.S. 1030 , 109 S.Ct. 838 , 102 L.Ed.2d 970 (1989)(“In support of this ‘injunction,’ the district court necessarily had the power to enforce the order, at any point while the order was in effect, including periods after judgment.”); In re Glannon, 245 B.R. 882, 887 (D.Kan.2000); Speleos v. McCarthy, 201 B.R. 325, 329 (D.D.C.1996); In re Leach, 194 B.R. 812, 815 (E.D.Mic…
discussed
Cited "see"
Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians v. New York
See Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of New York, 178 F.3d 95, 97 (2d Cir.1999) (per curiam), aff'g 26 F.Supp.2d 555 (W.D.N.Y.1998), ce rt. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000); see, e.g., Arizona v. California, 460 U.S. 605, 614 , 103 S.Ct. 1382 , 75 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983) (holding that tribes’ intervention in action brought by United States against states does not violate Eleventh Amendment because “[t]he Tribes do not seek to bring new claims or issues against the states”).
cited
Cited "see"
Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.
See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 1073 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1060 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Dubuc v. Green Oak Township
See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 1073 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1060 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marchese v. Umstead
See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 1073, 1074 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1060 (U.S.2000); City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 439 , 105 *371 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Of Connecticut Department Of Environmental Protection v. Occupational Safety And Health Administration
See, e.g., Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 912-14 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that state sovereign immunity did not bar an Indian tribe's action against Minnesota because the United States had intervened and sought the same relief as the tribe) (discussed in Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555, 564 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000)). 31 Connecticut's sovereign immunity does not bar OSHA from intervening as a party in a case originally brought by a private citizen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection v. Occupational Safety & Health Administration
See, e.g., Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v. Minnesota, 124 F.3d 904, 912-14 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding that state sovereign immunity did not bar an Indian tribe’s action against Minnesota because the United States had intervened and sought the same relief as the tribe) (discussed in Seneca Nation of Indians v. New York, 26 F.Supp.2d 555, 564 (W.D.N.Y.1998), aff'd, 178 F.3d 95 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 662 (2000)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re D.L.C.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 411.143(c)(3) (requiring personal identification information to be removed prior to establishing a population statistics database, etc.); see also Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1095-96 (Mass.1999) (holding that where DNA Act provides safeguards against wrongful use of DNA information and limits purposes for which DNA records may be distributed, plaintiffs’ speculation that data may be used wrongfully is contrary to language of Act), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DLC
See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 411.143 (c)(3) (requiring personal identification information to be removed prior to establishing a population statistics database, etc.); see also Landry v. Attorney General, 429 Mass. 336 , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1095-96 (Mass.1999) (holding that where DNA Act provides safeguards against wrongful use of DNA information and limits purposes for which DNA records may be distributed, plaintiffs' speculation that data may be used wrongfully is contrary to language of Act), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1073 , 120 S.Ct. 785 , 145 L.Ed.2d 663 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
in the Matter of R.W.W.
See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 411.143(c)(3) (requiring personal identification information to be removed prior to establishing a population statistics database, etc.); see also Landry v. Attorney General , 709 N.E.2d 1085 , 1095-96 (Mass. 1999) (holding that where DNA Act provides safeguards against wrongful use of DNA information and limits purposes for which DNA records may be distributed, plaintiffs’ speculation that data may be used wrongfully is contrary to language of Act), cert. denied , 528 U.S. 1073 (2000).
In re Nance In re Mayes In re Campbell In re Spencer In re Warren In re Ramirez Vela In re YoungBear and In re Williams
No. 99-7086; No. 99-7222; No. 99-7303; No. 99-7332; No. 99-7362; No. 99-7366; No. 99-7404; No. 99-7430.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2000.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.