green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Boivin v. Black
See Collins v. Montgomery County Bd. of Prison Inspectors, 176 F.3d 679, 686 (3d Cir.1999) (en banc), cert. denied, — Ú.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rackman v. Microsoft Corp.
See Rodime PLC v. Seagate Technology, Inc., 174 F.3d 1294, 1301 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 933 , 145 L.Ed.2d 812 (2000). “[T]he construction of a patent, including terms of art within its claim, is exclusively within the province of the court.” Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 372, 116 S.Ct. 1384 , 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996).
cited
Cited "see"
Herrera-Inirio v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See New York v. United States, 179 F.3d 29 , 33-34 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.
In addition, “illegal or fraudulent lobbying activities that would normally be immunized by Noerr-Pen-nington lose .their protection if they occur in a judicial or quasi-judicial setting[.j” Boone, 841 F.2d at 895-96 ; see also Rodime PLC v. Seagate Technology, Inc., 174 F.3d 1294, 1307 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“Noerr-Pennington does not protect conduct which is otherwise unlawful.”), cert. denied, 528 *1042 U.S. 1115, 120 S.Ct. 933 , 145 L.Ed.2d 812 (2000); In re American Continental Corp./Lincoln Savings and Loan Securities Litigation, 794 F.Supp. 1424, 1448 (D.Ariz.1992) (“Noerr-Pennington…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. Daley
I recognize that three courts of appeals have upheld the § 1997(e) limits on attorney fee awards, see Hadix v. Johnson, 230 F.3d 840 (6th Cir.2000); Boivin v. Black, 225 F.3d 36 (1st Cir.2000); Madrid v. Gomez, 190 F.3d 990 (9th Cir.1999); see also Collins v. Montgomery County Board of Prison Inspectors, 176 F.3d 679, 686 (3d Cir.1999), 1 cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1115 , 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 811 (2000) (en banc panel divided equally on constitutionality of provision limiting fees to 150% of judgment), and that federal statutes carry a presumption of constitutionality not easily overcome.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
A.K. Stamping Co. v. Instrument Specialties Co.
See Mars Inc. v. Kabushiki-Kaisha Nippon Conlux, 24 F.3d 1368, 1373 (Fed.Cir.1994) (“infringement of patent rights ... is not generally recognized as coming within the rubric of ‘unfair competition’ ”); see also Rodime PLC v. Seagate Technology, Inc., 174 F.3d 1294, 1306 (Fed.Cir.1999) (“[t]he patent laws will not preempt such claims if they include additional elements not found in the federal patent law cause of action”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 933 , 145 L.Ed.2d 812 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul A. Wright, on Behalf of All Similarly Situated Persons v. Chase Riveland
(2×)
“The notion of punishment, as we commonly understand it, cuts across the division between the civil and the criminal law,.... ” United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435, 447-48 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989); see also Louis v. Commissioner, 170 F.3d 1232, 1236 (9th Cir.1999) (“Even a civil sanction may be punitive for Eighth Amendment purposes.”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 932 , 145 L.Ed.2d 812 (2000). *915 Two questions are pertinent when determining whether the Excessive Fines Clause has been violated: (1) Is the statutory provision a fine, ie., does it impose pun…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fields
v.
Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board
v.
Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board
No. 99-528.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2000.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certio-rari denied.