green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“in the face of this evidence that the university had a procedure in place to handle harassment, gawley has no evidence that the university failed to exercise reasonable care in preventing ... the harassing behavior”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Collette v. Stein Mart, Inc., et
in the face of this evidence that the university had a procedure in place to handle harassment, gawley has no evidence that the university failed to exercise reasonable care in preventing ... the harassing behavior
discussed
Cited "see"
Munroe v. Compaq Computer Corp.
See Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 294-295 (2d Cir.1999) (constructive discharge is not a tangible employment action because, among other things, it is not ratified or approved by the employer), cer t. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000); Scott v. Ameritex Yarn, 72 F.Supp.2d 587, 594 (D.S.C.1999) (constructive discharge is not a tangible employment action because it is not made with the authority or approval of the employer); Desmarteau v. Wichita, 64 F.Supp.2d 1067, 1079 (D.Kan.1999) (the Supreme Court’s focus on the tangible actions of the s…
discussed
Cited "see"
Little v. National Broadcasting Co., Inc.
See id. (citing Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 295 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000); Franklin v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., No. 98 Civ. 2286, 1999 WL 796170 , at *8 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilburn v. Fleet Financial Group, Inc.
See Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 295 (2d Cir.1999) (constructive discharge not a tangible employment action), cert d&nied sub nom., 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stricker v. Cessford Construction Co.
See Cherry v. Menard, Inc., 101 F.Supp.2d 1160, 1171-77 (N.D.Iowa 2000) (rejecting the contrary holding of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000)).
cited
Cited "see"
O'DELL v. Trans World Entertainment Corp.
See Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 295 (2d Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000); Franklin, 1999 WL 796170 , at *8.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ingram v. Coca-Cola Co.
See Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 292 (2d Cir.1999) (finding commonality for class claim that granting discretionary authority to supervisory employees resulted in pattern and practice of discrimination) ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000); Shipes v. Trinity Indus., 987 F.2d 311 , 316 (5th Cir.1993) (stating that allegations of similar discriminatory employment practices like using entirely subjective personnel processes that discriminate satisfy commonality requirement).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lisa L. Fitzgerald v. William Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
If the supervisor’s harassment did not culminate in a “tangible employment action,” Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. at 765, 118 S.Ct. 2257 ; see Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 191 F.3d 283, 294 (2d Cir.1999) (constructive discharge, see Part II.A.2. below, is not considered a “tangible” employment action for these purposes), ceH. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000), an employer may avoid liability if (a) it “exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior, and (b) ... the plaintiff emp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendez v. Radec Corp.
“In determining the propriety of a class action, the question is not whether the plaintiff has stated a cause of action or will prevail on the merits, but rather whether the requirements of Rule 23 are met.” Id. at 178 , 94 S.Ct. 2140 (quoting Miller v. Mackey Int’l, 452 F.2d 424 , 427 (5th Cir.1971)); see also Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 292 (2d Cir.1999) (class plaintiffs need not demonstrate at certification stage that they will prevail on the merits), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.
“In determining the propriety of a class action, the question is not whether the plaintiff has stated a cause of action or will prevail on the merits, but rather whether the requirements of Rule 23 are met.” Id. at 178 , 94 S.Ct. 2140 (quoting Miller v. Mackey Int’l, 452 F.2d 424 , 427 (5th Cir.1971)); see also Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter R.R., 191 F.3d 283, 292 (2d Cir.1999) (class plaintiffs need not demonstrate at certification stage that they will prevail on the merits), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Entrot v. BASF Corp.
Compare Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 191 F. 3d 283, 294-95 (2d Cir.1999) (ruling that a "constructive discharge" is not a "tangible employment action" because it "is not ratified or approved by the employer"), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed. 2d 791 (2000), with Jackson v. Ark.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Northwest Airlines Corp.
First, while it is evident that Defendants have a number of problems with the analysis offered by Plaintiffs’ experts, and that the two sides’ experts reach diametrically opposed conclusions on a number of points, it is equally clear that, “[a]t this stage, the Court should not delve into the merits of an expert’s opinion or indulge ‘dueling’ between opposing experts.” In re Car-dizem CD Antitrust Litigation, 200 F.R.D. 297, 311 (E.D.Mich.2001); see also Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 191 F.3d 283, 293 (2d Cir.1999), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leslie Kohler,plaintiff-Appellant v. Inter-Tel Technologies,defendant-Appellee
Compare Caridad, 191 F.3d at 294 (holding constructive discharge not a tangible employment action), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1107 , 120 S.Ct. 1959 , 146 L.Ed.2d 791 (2000), with Durham Life Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sanwick
v.
Carver, Warden
v.
Carver, Warden
No. 99M85.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2000.
529 U.S. 1107
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
Motion to direct the Clerk to file petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.