green
Positive treatment
2.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Aros v. Stewart
See Swoopes v. Sublett, 196 F.3d 1008, 1009-10 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1124 , 120 S.Ct. 1996 , 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Magellan Real Estate Investment Trust v. Losch
See MRO Communications, Inc. v. AT & T Corp., 197 F.3d 1276 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 1995 , 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jamal Williams, AKA Jamal Abdullah
See, e.g., Wilson v. State, 734 So.2d 1107, 1111 (Fla.Ct.App.1999), review denied, 749 So.2d 504 (Fla.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1124 , 120 S.Ct. 1996 , 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000) (risk of “passenger access to weapons potentially concealed inside a car[ ] would be increased if passengers were forced back inside the vehicle”) (emphasis in original).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Data Corp. v. United States
See also Telecom USA Inc. v. United States, 192 F.3d 1068, 1070 (D.C.Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1123 , 120 S.Ct. 1995 , 146 L.Ed.2d 820 (2000); S.Rep.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MCI Communications Corp. and Subsidiaries
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-1176.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 2000.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.