United States v. Mead Corp., 530 U.S. 1202 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Mead Corp., 530 U.S. 1202 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Orleans Parish Sch (ca5, 2001-03-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Orleans Parish Sch
5th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
Cir. 1999), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 -20- S.Ct. 2194, 147 L.Ed.2d 231 (2000).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Riley v. St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
5th Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
On the other hand, although we indicated that a relator has significant control over qui tam litigation when the government chooses not to intervene, we stated that the government still "retains some control over the qui tam suit.” Id. at 289-90, 293.
cited Cited "see" General Electric Company - Medical Systems Group v. United States
Fed. Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mead Corp. v. United States, 185 F.3d 1304, 1306 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. granted, 530 U.S. 1202 , 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 231 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Glover-Dorsey v. University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
S.D. Tex. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Texas Tech Univ., 171 F.3d 279 , 279 n. 9 (5th Cir.1999) ("Where two panel decisions conflict, the prior decision constitutes the binding precedent”), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1202 , 120 S.Ct. 2194 , 147 L.Ed.2d 231 (2000); United States v. Gray, 751 F.2d 733 (5th Cir.1985) ("Under our court rules any such inconsistency must be resolved in favor of the earlier line, absent intervening decisions by the Supreme Court”); Nieto, 108 F.3d at 621 n. 7 (noting that insofar as the district court's decision was based on recent but conflicting decisions interpreting this element o…
cited Cited "see" Fent v. Oklahoma Water Resources Board
10th Cir. · 2000 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Tex. Tech Univ., 171 F.3d 279 , 285 n. 9 (5th Cir.1999) (citing similar decisions from several circuits), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2194 , 147 L.Ed.2d 231 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. Williamson
5th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Texas Tech Univ., 171 F.3d 279 , 285 n. 9 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, —— U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 2194 , 147 L.Ed.2d 231 (2000) (observing that when two prior panel decisions conflict, the first decision controls); see also Luna v. United States Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 948 F.2d 169, 172 (5th Cir.1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Glaxo Wellcome Inc. v. United States (2×)
Ct. Intl. Trade · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Mead Corp. v. United States, 185 F.3d 1304 (Fed.Cir.1999), cert. granted, —• U.S.-, 120 S.Ct. 2193 , 147 L.Ed.2d 231 , 68 USLW 3739 (U.S.May30, 2000), argued November 8, 2000.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Mead Corp.
No. 99-1434.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 30, 2000.
530 U.S. 1202
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari granted.