green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
County of Benton v. Kismet Investors, Inc.
See Kismet Investors, Inc. v. County of Benton, 617 N.W.2d 85 (Minn.App.2000), review denied (Minn. Nov. 15, 2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2356 , 153 L.Ed.2d 178 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
See J&B Entm't, Inc. v. City of Jackson, 152 F.3d 362, 371 (5th Cir.1998) (holding that “Renton teaches us that [to pass the substantial interest test] the government must produce some evidence of adverse secondary effects” that the ordinance works to eliminate); see also Flanigan's Enter., Inc. v. Fulton County, Ga., 242 F.3d 976 , 985 (11th Cir.2001) (holding that "to meet their burden” under the substantial interest prong, "the Defendants must have some factual basis for the claim” that adult entertainment activities restricted by the challenged statute "result ... in undesirable co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Encore Videos Inc v. City of San Antonio
Because Lakeland Lounge did not state that the standards it imposed were the only ones required, it is not directly inconsistent with SDJ or with post- City of Renton Supreme Court opinions applying the time, place, and manner test. 5 See J&B Entm't, Inc. v. City of Jackson, 152 F.3d 362, 371 (5th Cir.1998) (holding that " Renton teaches us that [to pass the substantial interest test] the government must produce some evidence of adverse secondary effects" that the ordinance works to eliminate); see also Flanigan's Enter., Inc. v. Fulton County, Ga., 242 F.3d 976 , 985 (11th Cir. 2001) (holding…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Sergio Leonel Mendoze v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization Service
See, e.g., Flanigan’s Enters., Inc. of Ga. v. Fulton County, 242 F.3d 976 , 987 n. 16 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 904 , 122 S.Ct. 2356 , 153 L.Ed.2d 178 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
See J&B Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Jackson, 152 F.3d 362, 371 (5th Cir.1998) (holding that "Renton teaches us that [to pass the substantial interest test] the government must produce some evidence of adverse secondary effects” that the ordinance works to eliminate); see also Flanigans Enter., Inc. v. Fulton County, Ga., 242 F.3d 976 , 985 (11th Cir.2001) (holding that "to meet their burden” under the substantial interest prong, "the Defendants must have some factual basis for the claim” that adult entertainment activities restricted by the challenged statute "result ... in undesirabl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kismet Investors, Inc.
v.
County of Benton
v.
County of Benton
00-1305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 2002.
Published
KISMET INVESTORS, INC.
v.
COUNTY OF BENTON.
No. 00-1305.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 10, 2002.
1
Ct. App. Minn. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 617 N. W. 2d 85.