green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Loria v. Gorman
But cf. Sparing v. Vill. of Olympia Fields, 266 F.3d 684, 691 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002) (concluding “that the law surrounding Fourth Amendment ‘doorway arrest’ questions ... was not sufficiently settled or defined at the time of the arrest to defeat qualified immunity”); Joyce v. Town of Tewksbury, 112 F.3d 19, 22 (1st Cir.1997) (in banc) (per curiam) (same).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Theodore E. Loria v. Charles Gorman, Individually and in His Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Rochester, Robert Nitchman, Individually and in His Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Rochester, City of Rochester, Mark Wiater, George Markert, Individually and in His Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Rochester, Vasquez, Individually and in His Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Rochester, Debra Stritzel, Individually and in Her Capacity as an Employee of the City of Rochester, Theodore E. Loria v. Dale Feor, Individually and in His Capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Rochester, City of Rochester
But cf. Sparing v. Vill. of Olympia Fields, 266 F.3d 684, 691 (7th Cir.2001), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002) (concluding "that the law surrounding Fourth Amendment `doorway arrest' questions ... was not sufficiently settled or defined at the time of the arrest to defeat qualified immunity"); Joyce v. Town of Tewksbury, 112 F.3d 19, 22 (1st Cir.1997) (in banc) (per curiam) (same). 61 Our next step is to determine whether it was objectively reasonable for Gorman to believe that exigent circumstances justified his entry and arrest.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wallisa v. City of Hesparia
In considering "whether there was an immediate threat, a simple statement by an officer that he fears for his safety or the safety of others is not enough; there must be objective factors to justify such a concern." Mattos , 661 F.3d at 441-42 (internal quotation marks omitted); see Deorle v. Rutherford , 272 F.3d 1272 , 1281 (9th Cir. 2001), cert. denied , 536 U.S. 958 , 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Logan v. City of Pullman
See Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 958 , 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Eugene Bennett
See United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036, 1047 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 957 , 122 S.Ct. 2659 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buchanan v. City of Milwaukee
See Deorle v. Rutherford, 272 F.3d 1272, 1283 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 958 , 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002) (stating that “where it is or should be apparent to the officers that the individual involved is emotionally disturbed, that is a factor that must be considered in determining, under Graham, the reasonableness of the force employed”); Palmquist v. Selvik, 111 F.3d 1332, 1340-41 (7th Cir.1997) (indicating that an officer’s awareness of an emotionally disturbed person’s suicidal motivation might have a bearing on what tactics and level of force are reasonable…
cited
Cited "see"
Appolo Fuels, Inc. v. United States
See Rith Energy, Inc. v. United States, 247 F.3d 1355, 1359 (Fed.Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2660 , 153 L.Ed.2d 835 (2002). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rith Energy, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-1145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2002.
Published
RITH ENERGY, INC.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-1145.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 28, 2002.
1
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 247 F. 3d 1355.