green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“where appropriate, multipliers may range from 1.2 to 4 or even higher.”
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Chambers v. Whirlpool Corp.
where appropriate, multipliers may range from 1.2 to 4 or even higher.
discussed
Cited "see"
Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.
See Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, 1046-50 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002) (affirming $27,127,800 in attorney’s fees, which was 28% of a $96,885,000 common fund, based in part on the finding that “counsel pursued [the] case in the absence of supporting precedents”). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Department of Veterans Affairs (Va) Data Theft Litigation
See Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 , 1050 n. 4 (9th Cir.2002), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002) (summarizing fees awarded in 34 common fund settlements from 1996-2001); see also Federal Judicial Center, Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth § 14.121, at 188 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Pacific Properties & Development Corp.
See Fair Housing of Marin v. Combs, 285 F.3d 899, 902 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
Ronald Ray Smith v. Pacific Properties And Development Corporation
See Fair Housing of Marin v. Combs, 285 F.3d 899, 902 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re DPL Inc., Securities Litigation
See e.g., Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1018, 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002); In re Cendant Corp. Litigation, 264 F.3d 201 (3rd Cir.2001). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust Litigation
See, e.g., Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043 , 1050-51 (9th Cir.), cert denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002) (awarding 28% of an approximate $97 million dollar fund, which produced a 3.65 multiplier); In re Buspirone Antitrust Litig., No. 01-MD-1410, at 4, 42-45 (S.D.N.Y.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
See id. (citations omitted); see also Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, 1051-52 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1018 , 123 S.Ct. 536 , 154 L.Ed.2d 425 (2002); In re Bank.Am.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yohn
v.
University of Michigan Regents
v.
University of Michigan Regents
02-191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)
YOHN
v.
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN REGENTS ET AL.
No. 02-191.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 12, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 39 Fed. Appx. 225.