Bautista Rivera v. State Bar of California, 537 U.S. 1019 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Bautista Rivera v. State Bar of California, 537 U.S. 1019 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc. (cafc, 2003-09-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff-Cross v. Mustek Systems, Inc. And Mustek, Inc. (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., 292 F.3d 728, 743 (Fed.Cir.2002) (holding that “the evidence of record [comprised solely of oral testimony] did not provide the clear and convincing evidence necessary to invalidate the patent for prior public knowledge”), ce rt. denied, 537 U.S. 1019 , 123 S.Ct. 537 , 154 L.Ed.2d 426 (U.S.2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bautista Rivera
v.
State Bar of California
02-387.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 12, 2002.
537 U.S. 1019
Published

537 U.S. 1019

BAUTISTA RIVERA
v.
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 02-387.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 12, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

2

Sup. Ct. Cal. Certiorari denied.