green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Invitrogen Corp. v. Biocrest Manufacturing, l.p.
See In re Cruciferous Sprout Litig., 301 F.3d 1343, 1346 (Fed.Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S.Ct. 1487 , 155 L.Ed.2d 227 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Retail Services Inc. v. Freebies Publishing
A mere “scintilla of evidence in support of the plaintiffs position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff.” Id. at 252 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., 305 F.3d 397, 405 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S.Ct. 1486 , 155 L.Ed.2d 227 (2003) (affirming summary judgment on the basis of “overwhelming evidence” of genericness).
discussed
Cited "see"
Retail Services Inc. Freebie, Incorporated v. Freebies Publishing Eugene F. Zannon Gail Zannon, Retail Services Inc. Freebie, Incorporated v. Freebies Publishing Eugene F. Zannon Gail Zannon
A mere "scintilla of evidence in support of the plaintiff's position will be insufficient; there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff." Id. at 252 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; see Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., 305 F.3d 397, 405 (6th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S.Ct. 1486 , 155 L.Ed.2d 227 (2003) (affirming summary judgment on the basis of "overwhelming evidence" of genericness).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southerland v. City of New York
We concluded in dicta that our decisions to that date had left the defendants at bar “with little or no indication that their alleged misconduct, as near as it was to the constitutional borderline, would have even implicated serious constitutional concerns.” Id. at 107; see also Patel v. Searles, 305 F.3d 130, 139 (2d Cir.2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S.Ct. 1486 , 155 L.Ed.2d 227 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McKenzie-Adams
See id., 621-23 (right of freedom of association did not protect United States Jaycees’ exclusion of women from membership); see also Patel v. Searles, 305 F.3d 130, 136 (2d Cir. 2002) (right of freedom of association *511 protected plaintiffs familial relationship with wife, children, father and siblings from undue governmental interference), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S. Ct. 1486 , 155 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Nonwovens, Inc. v. Consumer Products Enterprises, Inc.
This rebuttable presumption, however, “evaporates as soon as evidence of invalidity is presented.” Door Systems, Inc. v. Pro-Line Door Systems, Inc., 83 F.3d 169, 172 (7th Cir.1996); see also Nartron Corp. v. STMicroelectronics, Inc., 305 F.3d 397 (6th Cir.2002) (granting summary judgment for a defendant who successfully overcame the presumption), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 907 , 123 S.Ct. 1486 , 155 L.Ed.2d 227 (2003); TE-TA-MA Truth Found-Family of URI, Inc. v. World Church of Creator, 297 F.3d 662, 665 (7th Cir.2002) (“[A]n incontestable registration is more like a bursting-bubble presump…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nartron Corp.
v.
Stmicroelectronics, Inc
v.
Stmicroelectronics, Inc
02-1008.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
NARTRON CORP.
v.
STMICROELECTRONICS, INC.
No. 02-1008.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 10, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 305 F. 3d 397.