Booker v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, 540 U.S. 811 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Booker v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, 540 U.S. 811 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
108 citation events (108 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Sanders (texapp, 2008-05-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Security Service Federal Credit Union v. Sanders
Tex. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ting v. AT & T, 182 F.Supp.2d 902, 933 (N.D.Ca.2002) (holding that, “[w]hereas this clause may be illegal as applied to plaintiffs’ statutory rights under the CLRA, it is not substantively unconscionable when applied to non-statutory claims.”), ajfd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 319 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); see also Hoover, 206 S.W.3d at 563 (provision in attorney-client contract held substantively unconscionable on public policy grounds); Crowell, 495 S.W.2d at 889 (contract exempting housing authori…
cited Cited "see" Motorcycle Excellence Group, Inc. v. BMW of North America, LLC (In Re Motorcycle Excellence Group, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Myrna Ochoa-Carrillo v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
The Supreme Court long ago characterized this due process argument as “without substance.” Marcello v. Bonds, 349 U.S. 302, 311 , 75 S.Ct. 757 , 99 L.Ed. 1107 (1955); accord Gomez-Chavez v. Perryman, 308 F.3d 796, 802 (7th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); United States v. Garcia-Martinez, 228 F.3d 956, 960-61 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1179 , 121 S.Ct. 1158 , 148 L.Ed.2d 1018 (2001); United States v. Benitez-Villafuerte, 186 F.3d 651, 659-60 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1097 , 120 S.Ct. 838 , 145 L.Ed.2d 704 (2000). 6.Final…
cited Cited "see" Chao v. Duncan (In Re Duncan)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Rossi (In Re Cambridge Capital, LLC)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Unin, 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Oligbo v. Louis (In Re Oligbo)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Ochs v. Nemes (In Re Nemes)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Kasper v. City of Middletown
D. Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 42 (2d Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 , 2003 WL 1988534 (Oct. 6, 2003).
cited Cited "see" In Re Apponline. Com, Inc.
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" Jacobs v. Matrix Capital Bank (In re AppOnline.com, Inc.)
Bankr. E.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Beshty v. General Motors
W.D.N.Y. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Weinstock v. Columbia University, 224 F.3d 33, 46 (2d Cir.2000) (rejecting contention that “raw data purportedly describing a pattern of under-representation and unequal opportunity for women faculty at Columbia leads to the conclusion that gender discrimination is in play here”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); Odom v. Frank, 3 F.3d 839, 849 (5th Cir.1993) (raw data of age, race, and location of persons promoted in Postal Service’s inspection service over several years was not “statistical evidence,” and was not, without more, competent to prove…
cited Cited "see" In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
D. Kan. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See AT&T Corp. v. Ting, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Mendez v. Johnson
6th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gomez-Chavez v. Perryman, 308 F.3d 796, 800 (7th Cir.2002) (holding that an alien “may not avoid the § 1252(g) bar by the simple expedient of recharacterizing a claim as one challenging a refusal to act”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
cited Cited "see" In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
D. Kan. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See AT & T Corp. v. Ting, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D. Kan. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ting v. AT&T, 319 F.3d 1126 , 1131 (9th Cir.) (filed-rate doctrine presumes customers have knowledge of the filed rate), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); Marcus, 138 F.3d at 63 (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hall v. North Bellmore School District
E.D.N.Y · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
June 26, 2009) ("[A]ll three terms are age-neutral and do not by themselves suggest age bias.”) (collecting cases); see also Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 44 (2d Cir.2000) (holding that descriptions of the plaintiff as "nice” and "nurturing” “provide[ ] no evidence of pretext or discriminatory intent” based on sex, because these are "simply not qualities that are stereotypically female”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of Buffalo
W.D.N.Y. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because the analysis of claims brought under the NYSHRL parallels the analysis of Title VII claims, the court considers these claims “in tandem.” Leopold v. Baccarat, Inc., 174 F.3d 261 , 264 n. 1 (2d Cir.1999); see also Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33 , 42 n. 1 (2d Cir.2000) (citing cases), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Whitlow v. VISITING NURSE ASS'N OF WESTERN NY
W.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
R.Civ.P. 56(e); Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548 ; see also Weinstock v. Columbia University, 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir.2000) (at summary judgment, “[t]he time has come ... ‘to put up or shut up.’ ”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 811 , 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Iberia Credit Bureau, Inc. v. Cingular Wireless LLC
5th Cir. · 2004 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Boomer v. AT&T, 309 F.3d 404, 417-23 (7th Cir.2002) (adopting such a theory), with Ting v. AT&T, 319 F.3d 1126 , 1135-47 (9th Cir.) (rejecting it), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Elana Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District, John J. Russell, Anne Brennan, Marilyn Wishnie
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Cf. Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 44-45 (2d Cir.2000) (suggesting that Price Waterhouse applies where a woman is maltreated for being too feminine, but finding inadequate evidence that plaintiff herself was thus stereotyped), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 53 , 157 L.Ed.2d 24 (2003); see also id. at 57 (Cardamone, J., dissenting) (concluding that Price Waterhouse applies whether the plaintiff is stereotyped as too feminine or too masculine, because in both cases, women “face[ ] ... employers [who] demand[ ] that they perform both ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ roles, y…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Booker
v.
City of St. Louis, Missouri
02-1511.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 811
Published

540 U.S. 811

BOOKER
v.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI, ET AL.

No. 02-1511.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 8th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 309 F. 3d 464.