green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2008 ·
…this court has previously held that the maximum score for a classification of mental retardation is an i.q. score of 70.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Green v. Johnson
(2×)
this court has previously held that the maximum score for a classification of mental retardation is an i.q. score of 70.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Spencer v. State
More recently, in Scott v. State, 937 So.2d 1065 (Ala.Crim.App.2005), this Court remanded the case for clarification of the sentencing order, noting in part: *250 “ Tn a listing of mitigating circumstances the court found not to exist, the court included, “Any other mitigating circumstance offered pursuant to § 18A-5-52, Code of Alabama 1975.” (C. 77.) In the next paragraph of the sentencing order, however, the court stated, “The Court considered the evidence presented by the defendant as evidence of non-statutory mitigating factors.” (C. 77.) Although the trial court need not list …
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Warden of Sussex I State Prison
See Johnson v. Commonwealth, 267 Va. 53, 75 , 591 S.E.2d 47, 59 (2004), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 901 , 125 S.Ct. 1589 , 161 L.Ed.2d 270 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Belisle v. State
See Duke v. State, 889 So.2d 1 (Ala.Crim. *309 App.2002), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 901 , 125 S.Ct. 1588 , 161 L.Ed.2d 270 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duke
v.
Alabama
v.
Alabama
04-6155.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 2005.
Cited by 12 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2)
DUKE
v.
ALABAMA.
No. 04-6155.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 7, 2005.
1
Ct. Crim. App. Ala. Reported below: 889 So. 2d 1; and motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).