green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
17.9 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
…the alabama supreme court . . . did not adopt any 'margin of error' when examining a defendant's iq score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hall v. Florida
the alabama supreme court . . . did not adopt any 'margin of error' when examining a defendant's iq score
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hall v. Florida
(2×)
the alabama supreme court . . . did not adopt any 'margin of error' when examining a defendant's iq score
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Green v. Johnson
this court has previ- ously held that the maximum score for a classification of mental retar- dation is an i.q. score of 70.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Green v. Johnson
(2×)
this court has previously held that the maximum score for a classification of mental retardation is an i.q. score of 70.
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Warden of Sussex I State Prison
See Johnson v. Commonwealth, 267 Va. 53, 75 , 591 S.E.2d 47, 59 (2004), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 901 , 125 S.Ct. 1589 , 161 L.Ed.2d 270 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Winston v. Warden (Unpublished Order)
See Johnson v. Commonwealth, 267 Va. 53, 75 , 591 S.E.2d 47, 59 (2004), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 901 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Belisle v. State
(2×)
See Duke v. State, 889 So.2d 1 (Ala.Crim. *309 App.2002), vacated on other grounds, 544 U.S. 901 , 125 S.Ct. 1588 , 161 L.Ed.2d 270 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. State
Edwards v. State, 469 So.2d 68, 70 (Miss.1985) (citing May v. State, 460 So.2d 778, 781 (Miss.1984)); see also Dy-cus v. State, 875 So.2d 140 , 164 (Miss.2004) [ (vacated by Dycus v. Mississippi, 544 U.S. 901 , 125 S.Ct. 1589 , 161 L.Ed.2d 271 (2005))].
Jones
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-7999.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 2005.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (3) · Supreme Court (3)
JONES
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.
No. 03-7999.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 7, 2005.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Reported below: 74 Fed. Appx. 317. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and cases remanded for further consideration in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).