Chicago Brand Indus., Inc. v. Mitutoyo Corp., 545 U.S. 1129 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Chicago Brand Indus., Inc. v. Mitutoyo Corp., 545 U.S. 1129 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc. (ca3, 2006-10-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hayes v. Genesis, 545 U.S. 1129 , 125 S.Ct. 2947 , 162 L.Ed.2d 868 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hesseltine v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
E.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Laches is an equitable doctrine that is “generally not available in a suit to enforce a statutory right because, in such a case, the statute of limitations is the appropriate defense.” Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. City of Wharton, 101 S.W.3d 633, 638 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied); see also Rogers v. City of San Antonio, 392 F.3d 758, 773 (5th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2945 , 162 L.Ed.2d 868 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chicago Brand Industrial, Inc.
v.
Mitutoyo Corp.
No. 04-1458.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 20, 2005.
545 U.S. 1129
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.