Env't Prot. Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife, 549 U.S. 1105 (2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Env't Prot. Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife, 549 U.S. 1105 (2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (44 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc. (ca1, 2007-06-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rodriguez-Ortiz v. Margo Caribe, Inc. (2×)
1st Cir. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc., 437 F.3d 588, 601 (7th Cir.2006) (describing the different approaches in the various circuits), cert. granted, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 853 , 166 L.Ed.2d 681 (2007). 4 .
discussed Cited "see" In Re XM Satellite Radio Holdings Securities Litigation (2×)
D.D.C. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., — U.S. -, -, 127 S.Ct. 853, 853 , 166 L.Ed.2d 681 (2007).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Coe v. Northern Pipe Products, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Iowa · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
No. R-1, 157 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir.1998); see also EEOC v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, 450 F.3d 476, 485-86 (10th Cir.2006) (opining that holding employers liable for subordinate bias on these theories comports with the basic agency principles incorporated by statute into Title VII and advances the purposes of Title VII, for example, because “a company’s organizational chart does not always accurately reflect its decisionmaking process”), cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1105 , 127 S.Ct. 852 , 166 L.Ed.2d 681 , and cert. dismissed, 549 U.S. 1334 , 127 S.Ct. 1931 , 167 L.Ed.2d 583 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Hutchinson Technology Inc. Securities Litigation (2×)
D. Minnesota · 2007 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. v. Tellabs, Inc., 437 F.3d 588, 602-03 (7th Cir.2006) (holding that the group-pleading doctrine is inconsistent with the Reform Act’s particularity requirements), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 853 , 166 L.Ed.2d 681 (Jan. 5, 2007); Southland, 365 F.3d at 364-65 (same); and In re Patterson Cos.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, petitioner,
v.
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al.
06-549.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 5, 2007.
549 U.S. 1105
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted. The case is consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. In addition to the questions presented by the petitions, the parties are requested to brief and argue the following question: "Whether the court of appeals correctly held that the Environmental Protection Agency's decision to transfer pollution permitting authority to Arizona under the Clean Water Act, see 33 U.S.C. § 1342(b), was arbitrary and capricious because it was based on inconsistent interpretations of Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2); and, if so, whether the court of appeals should have remanded to the Environmental Protection Agency for further proceedings without ruling on the interpretation of Section 7(a)(2)."