Handley v. Chase Bank USA N.A., 179 L. Ed. 2d 315 (2011). · Go Syfert
Handley v. Chase Bank USA N.A., 179 L. Ed. 2d 315 (2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ruiz (connappct, 2019-03-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ruiz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Outing , 298 Conn. 34 , 55, 3 A.3d 1 (2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 , 131 S.Ct. 1479 , 179 L.Ed.2d 316 (2011). 4 Welch identified the officer that responded to his home as the same officer, Santiago, who had testified during the motion to suppress hearing.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Griffin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Outing , 298 Conn. 34 , 56, 3 A.3d 1 (2010) (our Supreme Court "consistently has declined to consider the reliability of the identification if [it concludes] that the procedure was not unnecessarily suggestive"), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 , 131 S.Ct. 1479 , 179 L.Ed.2d 316 (2011).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Williams
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Outing, 298 Conn. 34, 48 , 3 A.3d 1 (2010) (if trial court finds that identification procedure was unnecessarily suggestive, identification still is admissible if court finds that it nevertheless is reliable based on totality of circumstances), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 , 131 S. Ct. 1479 , 179 L.
cited Cited "see" Carraway v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Outing, 298 Conn. 34, 63 , 3 A.3d 1 (2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 , 131 S. Ct. 1479 , 179 L.
discussed Cited "see" Morel v. Wilkins
Fla. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Twilegar v. State, 42 So.3d 177, 192 (Fla.2010) (“If the ruling consists of a mixed question of law and fact addressing certain constitutional issues ... the ultimate ruling must be subjected to de novo review but the court’s factual findings must be sustained if supported by competent substantial evidence.” (quoting State v. Glatzmayer, 789 So.2d 297 , 301 n. 7 (Fla.2001))), cert. denied, _ U.S. _, 131 S.Ct. 1476 , 179 L.Ed.2d 315 (2011).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Sullivan (Dissent)
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Outing, 298 Conn. 34, 85 , 3 A.3d 1 (2010), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 1225 , 131 S. Ct. 1479 , 179 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Payne
Conn. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
In particular, [i]t is improper for a prosecutor to tell a jury, explicitly or implicitly, that defense counsel is employing standard tactics used in all trials, because such an argument relies on facts not in evidence and has no bearing on the issue before the jury, namely, the guilt or innocence of the defendant.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Luster, 279 Conn. 414, 433-34 , 902 A.2d 636 (2006); see also State v. Outing, 298 Conn. 34, 82 , 3 A.3d 1 (2010) (“[t]he prosecutor is expected to refrain from impugning, directly or through implication, the integ…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patricia A. Handley
v.
Chase Bank USA N.A.
No. 10-7359.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2011.
179 L. Ed. 2d 315
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.

Same case below, 387 Fed. Appx. 166.