green
Positive treatment
10.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilford
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 242 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011); United States v. Rusher, 966 F.2d 868, 874 (4th Cir.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Issac Belt
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011). * Because Belt was sentenced in April 2006, prior to the FSA’s effective date, the FSA had no effect on Belt’s mandatory minimum sentence, and the district court properly concluded that Belt was not entitled to a sentence reduction under the Act.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jermaine Bland
See id. at 246 ("[A] panel of this court cannot overrule, explicitly or implicitly, the precedent set by a prior panel of this court.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. Dorsey v. United States, -U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2321, 2335 , 183 L.Ed.2d 250 (2012) (holding that the FSA applies retroactively to those whose crimes occurred before the FSA's effective date but who were sentenced after that date).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zhen Zhou Wu
See United States v. Alverio-Meléndez, 640 F.3d 412, 418 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.--, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre Green
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248-49 (4th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011) (FSA does not apply retroactively to cases pending on direct appeal where defendant was sentenced prior to effective date of the Act).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoine Lilly
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237 , 248 n. 5 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Ford
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 246 (4th Cir.) ("[A] panel of this court cannot overrule, explicitly or implicitly, the precedent set by a prior panel of this court.” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis
(2×)
See United States v. Jordan, 635 F.3d 1181, 1186 (11th Cir.2011), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aaron Coppedge
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237, 248-49 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Christian
See United States v. Bullard, 645 F.3d 237 , 248 n. 5 (4th Cir.) (reserving judgment on the question “whether the FSA could be found to apply to defendants whose offenses were committed before August 3, 2010, but who have not yet been sentenced”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 356 , 181 L.Ed.2d 225 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexis Alverio-Melendez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 11-5910.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2011.
181 L. Ed. 2d 225
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Same case below, 640 F.3d 412.