Butler v. Montana, 569 U.S. 1005 (2013). · Go Syfert
Search
Butler v. Montana, 569 U.S. 1005 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (58 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Jacques (conn, 2025-08-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2013 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jacques
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 520–21, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (overruled on other grounds by State v. Elson, 311 Conn. 726 , 91 A.3d 862 (2014)), cert. denied, 569 U.S. 1005 , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Manoj Jha (2×)
4th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Allmendinger, 706 F.3d 330, 341 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2747 , 186 L.Ed.2d 194 (2013).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Victor C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
While the admission of a hearsay statement is limited by the parameters of the confrontation clause; see State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 515, 55 A.3d 272 (2012), cert, denied, U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Patel
Conn. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 516 n.16, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Elson, 311 Conn. 726 , 728 n.14, 754, 91 A.3d 862 (2014)), cert. denied, 569 U.S. 1005 , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lebrick
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
C Turning to the merits of the defendant’s claim, we focus our analysis on the confrontation clause because the definition of unavailability is the same under both our rules of evidence and the confrontation clause, but the ultimate determination of whether the state’s efforts are constitutionally sufficient to establish the unavail- ability of the witness is a question of law reviewed de novo.10 See part I A of this opinion; see also State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 516 n.16, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (recognizing our ‘‘general practice of not addressing constitutional questions unless t…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Douglas Taylor (2×)
4th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
“In assessing whether a sentencing court has properly applied the Guidelines, we review factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo.” United States v. Llamas, 599 F.3d 381, 387 (4th Cir.2010); see also United States v. Allmendinger, 706 F.3d 330, 341 (4th Cir.) (noting that loss attributable to fraud is a factual finding that is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2747 , 186 L.Ed.2d 194 (2013).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Elson
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Cutler, 293 Conn. 303 , 324–25, 977 A.2d 209 (2009); State v. Bowman, 289 Conn. 809, 815 , 960 A.2d 1027 (2008); State v. Reid, 277 Conn. 764, 781 , 894 A.2d 963 (2006); see also State v. Cameron M., 307 Conn. 504 , 530 n.23, 55 A.3d 272 (2012) (noting state’s claim to contrary, and ‘‘assum[ing], without deciding, that the defendant’s brief adequately makes an ‘affirmative request’ for Golding review of his unpreserved constitutional claim’’), cert. denied, U.S. , 133 S. Ct. 2744 , 186 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Vanderhorst
D.S.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 334 ; see also Warren, 491 Fed.Appx. at 778 (“A reasonable jury could have concluded [defendant] knew [victim] ultimately would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act .... ” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2747 , 186 L.Ed.2d 202 (2013).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Troy BUTLER
v.
MONTANA.
No. 12–1251..
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 2013.
569 U.S. 1005
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Montana denied.