Gerth v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 181 (2013).

Gerth v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 181 (2013). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 7.2 score

20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: Kap Sun Bukta v. U.S. Attorney General (ca11, 2016-07-05)

Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2013 2019 2026

Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see" Kap Sun Bukta v. U.S. Attorney General

11th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Petite, 703 F.3d 1290 , 1292 n. 2 (11th Cir. 2013) cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S. Ct. 182 , 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013); Bryant v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium, 738 F.3d 1253, 1279 (11th Cir. 2013).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Jarrett Cannion

11th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high

Manual § 1B1.10, cmt. (n. 1(A)); see United States v. Hippolyte, 712 F.3d 535, 540-41 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 181 , 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Andrew James Pledger

11th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hippolyte, 712 F.3d 535, 542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 181 , 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013).

cited Cited "see" United States v. Ivory Charles Brinson

11th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hippolyte, 712 F.3d 535, 542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 181 , 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013); United States v. Berry, 701 F.3d 374, 376-78 (11th Cir.2012).

discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leonard v. Smith

11th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high

See United States v. Hippolyte, 712 F.3d 535 , 540—41 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 181 , 187 L.Ed.2d 124 (2013) (“In fine, it is clear that the new definition of applicable guideline range has nothing to do with mandatory mínimums and does nothing to alter this court’s rule that the applicable guideline range is the scope of the sentences available to the district court, which could be limited by a statutorily imposed mandatory minimum ‘guideline sentence.’ ” (quotation marks omitted)).