Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc., 134 S. Ct. 895 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Techs., Inc., 134 S. Ct. 895 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Clarke
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Clarke (2×)
unknown court · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Bank of Miami Springs, 655 F.2d 661 , 667 (C.A.5 1981)); see Nero Trading, LLC v. United States Dept. of Treasury, 570 F.3d 1244 , 1249 (C.A.11 2009) (reaffirming Southeast ). *2367 Every other Court of Appeals has rejected the Eleventh Circuit's view that a bare allegation of improper motive entitles a person objecting to an IRS summons to examine the responsible officials. 2 We granted certiorari to resolve that conflict, 571 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 895 , 187 L.Ed.2d 701 (2014), and we now vacate the Eleventh Circuit's opinion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.
v.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
No. 12–786..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 895
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.