green
Positive treatment
9.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Marblegate Asset Management, LLC v. Education Management Finance Corp.
See United States v. DiCristina, 726 F.3d 92, 96 (2d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 134 S.Ct. 1281 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 (2014) (quoting United States v. Kozeny, 541 F.3d 166, 171 (2d Cir. 2008)) (“When interpreting a statute, we ‘must begin with the language employed by Congress and the assumption that the ordinary meaning of that language accurately expresses the legislative purpose.’ ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Valle
But where, as here, the statute’s language is plain and unambiguous, the “sole function of the courts is to enforce it according to its terms.” United States v. Ron Pair Enters., Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 241 , 109 S.Ct. 1026 , 103 L.Ed.2d 290 (1989); accord United States v. DiCristina, 726 F.8d 92, 96 (2d Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1281 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbus-America Discovery Group, Inc. v. Unidentified, Wrecked & Abandoned Sailing Vessel
Tax Servs., Inc., 359 F.3d 699 , 705 (4th Cir.2004) (“When a district court’s decision is based on an interpretation of its own order, our .review is even more deferential because district courts are in the best position to interpret their own orders.”); see Wolfe v. Clarke, 718 F.3d 277, 284 (4th Cir.2013) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1281 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 (2014).
examined
Cited "see"
Deangelo Whiteside v. United States
(3×)
See Hawkins v. United States, 706 F.3d 820, 824 (7th Cir.2013) supplemented on denial ofreh’g, 724 F.3d 915 (7th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1280 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Ortiz v. United States
See Patel v. Napolitano, 706 F.3d 370, 372 (4th Cir.2013) (reviewing de novo issue district court did not address), petition for cert. filed, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1282 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 , 82 U.S.L.W. 3319 , 2014 WL 684079 (U.S. Nov. 15, 2013) (No. 13-606).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milan v. United States
See, e.g., Hawkins v. United States, 706 F.3d 820, 824 (7th Cir.2013), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1280 , 188 L.Ed.2d 299 (2014) (recognizing that post -Booker 8 —once the guidelines were no longer mandatory on district courts—errors in a defendant’s guidelines calculations were “less serious,” and as long as the sentence imposed was beneath the statutory maximum, it was not subject to correction on collateral review based on alleged errors in the guidelines calculations).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert LEIMKUEHLER, as Trustee of and on Behalf of the Leimkuehler, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan
v.
AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
v.
AMERICAN UNITED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.
No. 13–536..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 2014.
Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.