Ajoku v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1872 (2014). · Go Syfert
Ajoku v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 1872 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events (33 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shin v. United States (hid, 2021-10-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Shin v. United States
D. Haw. · 2021 · confidence medium
On April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court therefore granted the petition and “remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on March 10, 2014.” Ajoku v. United States, 572 U.S. 1056, 1056 (2014).
cited Cited "see" United States v. W. Wayne Perry, Jr.
4th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See 134 S.Ct. at 1872.
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Brewer
Mass. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Quinn, 728 F.3d 243, 252-253 (3d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1872 (2014) (concluding that in absence of prosecutorial misconduct, courts lack authority to grant use immunity to defense witness and expressly overturning Smith, supra, decision, noting that immunity is statutory creation within exclusive realm of prosecution).
discussed Cited "see" Valspar Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
D. Minnesota · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See InterDigital Commc'ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F.3d 1336, 1346-47 (Fed.Cir.2013) (“wholly groundless” inquiry asks only if there exists a "plausible argument” that the arbitration clause applies to the dispute), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Robert Franz
3rd Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Quinn, 728 F.3d 243, 261 (3d Cir.2013) (new trial), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1872 , 188 L.Ed.2d 916 (2014); United States v. Self, 681 F.3d 190, 199 (3d Cir.2012) (mistrial); United States v. Vosburgh, 602 F.3d 512, 537-38 (3d Cir.2010) (evidentiary issues). 21 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Raymond Demilia
8th Cir. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Heien v. North Carolina, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1872 , 188 L.Ed.2d 910 (2014). 2 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Azar v. Garza
SCOTUS · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., LG Electronics, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications, LLC, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondents withdrew the complaint they filed with the International Trade Commission); United States v. Samish Indian Nation, 568 U.S. 936 , 133 S.Ct. 423 , 184 L.Ed.2d 253 (2012) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondent voluntarily dismissed its claim in the Court of Federal Claims); Eisai Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 564 U.S. 1001 , 131 S.Ct. 2991 , 180 L.Ed.2d 818 (2011) (before the certiorari petition wa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelechi AJOKU
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–7264..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 1872
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on March 10, 2014. Justice SCALIA would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.