green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Shin v. United States
On April 21, 2014, the Supreme Court therefore granted the petition and “remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on March 10, 2014.” Ajoku v. United States, 572 U.S. 1056, 1056 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Brewer
See United States v. Quinn, 728 F.3d 243, 252-253 (3d Cir. 2013), cert. denied, 134 S. Ct. 1872 (2014) (concluding that in absence of prosecutorial misconduct, courts lack authority to grant use immunity to defense witness and expressly overturning Smith, supra, decision, noting that immunity is statutory creation within exclusive realm of prosecution).
discussed
Cited "see"
Valspar Corp. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
See InterDigital Commc'ns, LLC v. Int’l Trade Comm’n, 718 F.3d 1336, 1346-47 (Fed.Cir.2013) (“wholly groundless” inquiry asks only if there exists a "plausible argument” that the arbitration clause applies to the dispute), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Franz
See United States v. Quinn, 728 F.3d 243, 261 (3d Cir.2013) (new trial), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1872 , 188 L.Ed.2d 916 (2014); United States v. Self, 681 F.3d 190, 199 (3d Cir.2012) (mistrial); United States v. Vosburgh, 602 F.3d 512, 537-38 (3d Cir.2010) (evidentiary issues). 21 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Demilia
See Heien v. North Carolina, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1872 , 188 L.Ed.2d 910 (2014). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azar v. Garza
See, e.g., LG Electronics, Inc. v. InterDigital Communications, LLC, 572 U.S. ----, 134 S.Ct. 1876 , 188 L.Ed.2d 905 (2014) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondents withdrew the complaint they filed with the International Trade Commission); United States v. Samish Indian Nation, 568 U.S. 936 , 133 S.Ct. 423 , 184 L.Ed.2d 253 (2012) (after the certiorari petition was filed, respondent voluntarily dismissed its claim in the Court of Federal Claims); Eisai Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., 564 U.S. 1001 , 131 S.Ct. 2991 , 180 L.Ed.2d 818 (2011) (before the certiorari petition wa…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kelechi AJOKU
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–7264..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2014.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of the confession of error by the Solicitor General in his brief for the United States filed on March 10, 2014. Justice SCALIA would deny the petition for writ of certiorari.