Quince v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 2695 (2014). · Go Syfert
Quince v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 2695 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the pcra timeliness requirement ... is mandatory and jurisdictional in nature. ... the court cannot ignore a petition's untimeliness and reach the merits of the petition.”
21 citation events (21 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Fennell (pasuperct, 2018-03-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Commonwealth v. Fennell
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the pcra timeliness requirement ... is mandatory and jurisdictional in nature. ... the court cannot ignore a petition's untimeliness and reach the merits of the petition.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Woods
C.A.A.F. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
An appellate court reviews a trial court’s findings of fact for “clear error.” 1 Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242, 121 S.Ct. 1452 , 149 L.Ed.2d 430 (2001); see United States v. Olsen, 704 F.3d 1172, 1190 (9th Cir.2013) (ultimate determination of actual bias is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2711 , 189 L.Ed.2d 743 (2014); United States v. Powell, 226 F.3d 1181, 1188 (10th Cir.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Darcell QUINCE
v.
FLORIDA.
No. 13–5753..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2695

Case below, 116 So.3d 1262.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.