green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.1 score
“the pcra timeliness requirement ... is mandatory and jurisdictional in nature. ... the court cannot ignore a petition's untimeliness and reach the merits of the petition.”
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015
2020
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Fennell
the pcra timeliness requirement ... is mandatory and jurisdictional in nature. ... the court cannot ignore a petition's untimeliness and reach the merits of the petition.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Woods
An appellate court reviews a trial court’s findings of fact for “clear error.” 1 Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 , 242, 121 S.Ct. 1452 , 149 L.Ed.2d 430 (2001); see United States v. Olsen, 704 F.3d 1172, 1190 (9th Cir.2013) (ultimate determination of actual bias is reviewed for clear error), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2711 , 189 L.Ed.2d 743 (2014); United States v. Powell, 226 F.3d 1181, 1188 (10th Cir.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Darcell QUINCE
v.
FLORIDA.
v.
FLORIDA.
No. 13–5753..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 2014.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Case below, 116 So.3d 1262.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied.