Elonis v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2819 (2014). · Go Syfert
Search
Elonis v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2819 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Twitty (ca10, 2015-01-20)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Twitty
10th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Elonis v. United States, -U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2819 , 189 L.Ed.2d 784 (2014) (mem.); Wheeler, 776 F.3d at 740 n. 2, 2015 WL 191149 , at *3 n. 2 (noting pending issue in Elonis) Although he mentions Elonis in his briefing in this court, see Aplt.
discussed Cited "see" Scenic America, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mortgage Bankers Ass’n v. Harris, 720 F.3d 966 (D.C.Cir.2013), cert, granted sub nom., Nichols v. Mortgage Bankers Ass’n, 82 U.S.L.W. 3533 , — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2820 , 189 L.Ed.2d 784 (U.S. June 16, 2014) (No. 13-1052).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Williamson
D.D.C. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Elonis, 730 F.3d 321 (3d Cir.2013) (evidence was sufficient to support jury finding that defendant’s Facebook post regarding explosives was a “true threat” and thus not protected by the First Amendment), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2819 , 189 L.Ed.2d 784 (2014); United States v. Stewart, 411 F.3d 825, 828 (7th Cir.2005) (a “true threat” is one “wherein a reasonable person would foresee that the statement would be interpreted by those to whom the maker communicates ... as a serious expression of an intention to inflict bodily harm upon or take the …
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brossart
N.D. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
Curtis , at ¶ 5; see also United States v. Elonis, 730 F.3d 321, 329-32 (3rd Cir.2013), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 2819 , 189 L.Ed.2d 784 (2014).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anthony Douglas ELONIS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 13–983..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 2014.
134 S. Ct. 2819
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted. In addition to the question presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: "Whether, as a matter of statutory interpretation, conviction of threatening another person under 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) requires proof of the defendant's subjective intent to threaten."