Newkirk v. Shaw, 135 S. Ct. 187 (2014). · Go Syfert
Newkirk v. Shaw, 135 S. Ct. 187 (2014). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in heller, the supreme court did not specify what level of scrutiny courts must apply to a statute challenged under the second amendment. the heller court did, however, indicate that rational basis review is not appropriate.”
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego (ca9, 2016-06-09)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Edward Peruta v. County of San Diego
9th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in heller, the supreme court did not specify what level of scrutiny courts must apply to a statute challenged under the second amendment. the heller court did, however, indicate that rational basis review is not appropriate.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeCiccio
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 790 (2011); see also United States v. Chovan, 735 F.3d 1127 , 1136–37 (9th Cir. 2013), cert. denied, U.S. , 135 S. Ct. 187 , 190 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth NEWKIRK
v.
William SHAW, Judge
No. 14–5031..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2014.
135 S. Ct. 187

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia denied.