green
Positive treatment
10.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2016
2021
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Wash. v. Trump
See United States v. Texas , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 906 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sharemaster v. U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Salman, 792 F.3d 1087, 1090 (9th Cir. 2015), cert. granted in part, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 899 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016), and aff'd, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 420 , 196 L.Ed.2d 351 (2016); United States v. Ullah, 976 F.2d 509, 514 (9th Cir. 1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Spivak
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Salman, 792 F.3d 1087, 1094 (9th Cir.2015) (“Proof that the insider disclosed material nonpublic information with the intent to benefit a trading relative or friend is sufficient to establish the breach of fiduciary duty element of insider trading.”), cert. granted in part, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 899 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
cited
Cited "see"
West Virginia Ex Rel. Morrisey v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
See Texas v. United States, 809 F.3d 134 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. granted,-U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 906 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parigian
See United States v. Salman, 792 F.3d 1087, 1094 (9th Cir. 2015) (“Proof that the insider disclosed material nonpublic information with the intent to benefit a trading relative or friend is sufficient to establish the breach of fiduciary duty element of insider trading.”), ce rt. granted in part, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 899 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Adolfo Rauda-Constantino
See Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 894 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Justin Werle
See United States v. Mathis, 786 F.3d 1068 , 1075 n. 6 (8th Cir.2015), cert. granted - U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 894 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016) (discussing the circuit split regarding divisibility analysis).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Casa De Md. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
See also Texas v. United States , 809 F.3d 134 , 165-170 (5th Cir. 2015), aff'd , --- U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 906 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose Carcamo v. Loretta Lynch
See, e.g., United States v. Mathis, 786 F.3d 1068, 1074-75 , 1075 n. 7 (8th Cir.2015), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 894 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016); United States v. Trent, 767 F.3d 1046, 1055-57 (10th Cir.2014), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 135 S.Ct. 1447 , 191 L.Ed.2d 400 (2015); United States v.Herrera-Alvarez, 753 F.3d 132, 139-40 (5th Cir.2014); United States v. Hockenberry, 730 F.3d 645, 669 (6th Cir.2013).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jonathon Lamb
See, e.g., United States v. Mathis, 786 F.3d 1068, 1074-75 (8th Cir.2015) (construing a similar Iowa burglary statute), cert. granted, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 894 , 193 L.Ed.2d 788 (2016).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brandon BERNARD
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 14–8071..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 19, 2016.
136 S. Ct. 892
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.